Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGCX vs LGCSX
CWGCX vs LGCSX Comparison
Open Charts CWGCX vs LGCSX
CWGCX vs LGCSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGCX vs. LGCSX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGCX is a Buy and LGCSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGCX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. LGCSX (388M). CWGCX pays higher dividends than LGCSX: CWGCX (0.71) vs LGCSX (0.45). CWGCX was incepted earlier than LGCSX: CWGCX (26 years) vs LGCSX (10 years). CWGCX (1.48) is less costly to investors than LGCSX (1.04). LGCSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. CWGCX (44.00). LGCSX has a lower initial minimum investment than CWGCX: LGCSX (0) vs CWGCX (250). LGCSX (10.75) and CWGCX (10.62) have marching annual gain over last year. LGCSX return over 5 years is better than : 38.12 vs. CWGCX (28.85).
| CWGCX | LGCSX | CWGCX / LGCSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.90 | 164% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 1.04 | 142% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.442 | 9.481 | 163% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 158B | 388M | 40,722% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.71 | 0.45 | 157% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.62 | 10.75 | 99% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.27 | 70.89 | 68% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.85 | 38.12 | 76% |
| Returns for 10 years | 90.68 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement