Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGCX vs LGCSX
CWGCX vs LGCSX Comparison
Open Charts CWGCX vs LGCSX
CWGCX vs LGCSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGCX vs. LGCSX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGCX is a Hold and LGCSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGCX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. LGCSX (399M). CWGCX pays higher dividends than LGCSX: CWGCX (0.75) vs LGCSX (0.46). CWGCX was incepted earlier than LGCSX: CWGCX (25 years) vs LGCSX (9 years). CWGCX (1.48) is less costly to investors than LGCSX (1.04). LGCSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. CWGCX (44.00). LGCSX has a lower initial minimum investment than CWGCX: LGCSX (0) vs CWGCX (250). LGCSX (21.45) and CWGCX (20.87) have marching annual gain over last year. LGCSX return over 5 years is better than : 40.41 vs. CWGCX (31.28).
| CWGCX | LGCSX | CWGCX / LGCSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.90 | 164% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 1.04 | 142% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.243 | 8.840 | 172% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 160B | 399M | 40,100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 0.46 | 164% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.87 | 21.45 | 97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.77 | 73.47 | 68% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.28 | 40.41 | 77% |
| Returns for 10 years | 102.58 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement