Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGCX vs LGCVX
CWGCX vs LGCVX Comparison
Open Charts CWGCX vs LGCVX
CWGCX vs LGCVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGCX vs. LGCVX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGCX is a Hold and LGCVX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGCX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. LGCVX (398M). CWGCX pays higher dividends than LGCVX: CWGCX (0.75) vs LGCVX (0.66). CWGCX was incepted earlier than LGCVX: CWGCX (25 years) vs LGCVX (9 years). CWGCX (1.48) is less costly to investors than LGCVX (0.79). LGCVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. CWGCX (44.00). LGCVX has a lower initial minimum investment than CWGCX: LGCVX (0) vs CWGCX (250). LGCVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.63 vs. CWGCX (17.91). LGCVX return over 5 years is better than : 40.33 vs. CWGCX (28.03).
| CWGCX | LGCVX | CWGCX / LGCVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.65 | 228% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.79 | 187% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.037 | 8.689 | 150% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 160B | 398M | 40,201% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 0.66 | 114% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.91 | 20.63 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.90 | 74.36 | 63% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.03 | 40.33 | 69% |
| Returns for 10 years | 98.70 | N/A | - |