Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGCX vs NSRIX
CWGCX vs NSRIX Comparison
Open Charts CWGCX vs NSRIX
CWGCX vs NSRIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGCX vs. NSRIX commentary
Jul 27, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGCX is a Buy and NSRIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGCX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. NSRIX (2.18B). NSRIX pays higher dividends than CWGCX: NSRIX (1.59) vs CWGCX (0.71). CWGCX was incepted earlier than NSRIX: CWGCX (25 years) vs NSRIX (18 years). CWGCX (1.48) is less costly to investors than NSRIX (0.29). CWGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. NSRIX (7.99). NSRIX has a lower initial minimum investment than CWGCX: NSRIX (0) vs CWGCX (250). NSRIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.58 vs. CWGCX (10.90). NSRIX return over 5 years is better than : 46.81 vs. CWGCX (26.41).
| CWGCX | NSRIX | CWGCX / NSRIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.29 | 510% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.29 | 510% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.955 | 7.669 | 156% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 158B | 2.18B | 7,251% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.71 | 1.59 | 45% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.90 | 12.58 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.95 | 49.05 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.41 | 46.81 | 56% |
| Returns for 10 years | 84.80 | 176.81 | 48% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers