Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGFX vs FGILX
CWGFX vs FGILX Comparison
Open Charts CWGFX vs FGILX
CWGFX vs FGILX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGFX vs. FGILX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGFX is a Hold and FGILX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGFX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. FGILX (473M). CWGFX pays higher dividends than FGILX: CWGFX (1.30) vs FGILX (0.83). CWGFX was incepted earlier than FGILX: CWGFX (25 years) vs FGILX (14 years). FGILX (0.91) is less costly to investors than CWGFX (0.79). CWGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FGILX (19.00). FGILX has a lower initial minimum investment than CWGFX: FGILX (0) vs CWGFX (250). FGILX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.38 vs. CWGFX (18.82). FGILX return over 5 years is better than : 52.36 vs. CWGFX (31.85).
| CWGFX | FGILX | CWGFX / FGILX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.91 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.91 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.406 | 10.530 | 127% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 160B | 473M | 33,827% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.30 | 0.83 | 156% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.82 | 23.38 | 81% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.18 | 65.60 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.85 | 52.36 | 61% |
| Returns for 10 years | 105.40 | 154.80 | 68% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement