Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGFX vs FTWRX
CWGFX vs FTWRX Comparison
Open Charts CWGFX vs FTWRX
American Funds Capital World Gr&Inc F1
Price$75.64
Change-$0.31 (-0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets142.48B
Templeton World R6
Price$19.63
Change-$0.15 (-0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.91B
CWGFX vs FTWRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGFX vs. FTWRX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGFX is a Buy and FTWRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGFX has more cash in the bank: 142B vs. FTWRX (2.91B). CWGFX pays higher dividends than FTWRX: CWGFX (1.35) vs FTWRX (0.26). CWGFX was incepted earlier than FTWRX: CWGFX (25 years) vs FTWRX (12 years). CWGFX (0.80) and FTWRX (0.78) have similar cost to investors . FTWRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.04 vs. CWGFX (27.00). CWGFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTWRX: CWGFX (250) vs FTWRX (1000000). FTWRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.31 vs. CWGFX (12.18). FTWRX return over 5 years is better than : 60.90 vs. CWGFX (51.81).
| CWGFX | FTWRX | CWGFX / FTWRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.75 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.78 | 103% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.583 | 19.157 | 107% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 142B | 2.91B | 4,883% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.35 | 0.26 | 519% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.18 | 13.31 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 68.97 | 83.03 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.81 | 60.90 | 85% |
| Returns for 10 years | 78.39 | 29.46 | 266% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement