Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGFX vs FTWRX
CWGFX vs FTWRX Comparison
Open Charts CWGFX vs FTWRX
American Funds Capital World Gr&Inc F1
Price$74.59
Change+$0.07 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets138.65B
Templeton World R6
Price$19.35
Change+$0.05 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.8B
CWGFX vs FTWRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGFX vs. FTWRX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGFX is a Hold and FTWRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGFX has more cash in the bank: 139B vs. FTWRX (2.8B). CWGFX pays higher dividends than FTWRX: CWGFX (1.32) vs FTWRX (0.25). CWGFX was incepted earlier than FTWRX: CWGFX (25 years) vs FTWRX (13 years). CWGFX (0.80) and FTWRX (0.78) have similar cost to investors . FTWRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 100.16 vs. CWGFX (27.00). CWGFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTWRX: CWGFX (250) vs FTWRX (1000000). CWGFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.16 vs. FTWRX (9.61). FTWRX return over 5 years is better than : 48.99 vs. CWGFX (41.60).
| CWGFX | FTWRX | CWGFX / FTWRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.75 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.78 | 103% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.909 | 16.854 | 112% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 139B | 2.8B | 4,959% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.32 | 0.25 | 522% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.16 | 9.61 | 127% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.59 | 64.47 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.60 | 48.99 | 85% |
| Returns for 10 years | 73.79 | 27.64 | 267% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement