Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGFX vs NSRKX
CWGFX vs NSRKX Comparison
Open Charts CWGFX vs NSRKX
CWGFX vs NSRKX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGFX vs. NSRKX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGFX is a StrongBuy and NSRKX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGFX has more cash in the bank: 156B vs. NSRKX (2.29B). NSRKX pays higher dividends than CWGFX: NSRKX (1.63) vs CWGFX (1.31). CWGFX was incepted earlier than NSRKX: CWGFX (25 years) vs NSRKX (6 years). CWGFX (0.79) is less costly to investors than NSRKX (0.24). CWGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. NSRKX (7.99). CWGFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSRKX: CWGFX (250) vs NSRKX (2500). NSRKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.72 vs. CWGFX (17.16). NSRKX return over 5 years is better than : 53.44 vs. CWGFX (36.91).
| CWGFX | NSRKX | CWGFX / NSRKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.24 | 329% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.24 | 329% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.994 | 13.675 | 124% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 156B | 2.29B | 6,815% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.31 | 1.63 | 81% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.16 | 18.72 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.63 | 63.98 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.91 | 53.44 | 69% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.42 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement