Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGFX vs NSRKX
CWGFX vs NSRKX Comparison
Open Charts CWGFX vs NSRKX
CWGFX vs NSRKX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGFX vs. NSRKX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGFX is a Buy and NSRKX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGFX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. NSRKX (2.25B). NSRKX pays higher dividends than CWGFX: NSRKX (1.63) vs CWGFX (1.30). CWGFX was incepted earlier than NSRKX: CWGFX (25 years) vs NSRKX (6 years). CWGFX (0.79) is less costly to investors than NSRKX (0.24). CWGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. NSRKX (7.99). CWGFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSRKX: CWGFX (250) vs NSRKX (2500). NSRKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.95 vs. CWGFX (14.10). NSRKX return over 5 years is better than : 52.07 vs. CWGFX (31.04).
| CWGFX | NSRKX | CWGFX / NSRKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.24 | 329% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.24 | 329% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.209 | 10.439 | 127% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 158B | 2.25B | 7,032% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.30 | 1.63 | 80% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.10 | 17.95 | 79% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.01 | 54.42 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.04 | 52.07 | 60% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.50 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers