Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGFX vs VMVFX
CWGFX vs VMVFX Comparison
Open Charts CWGFX vs VMVFX
CWGFX vs VMVFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGFX vs. VMVFX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGFX is a Buy and VMVFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGFX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. VMVFX (2B). VMVFX pays higher dividends than CWGFX: VMVFX (2.11) vs CWGFX (1.31). CWGFX was incepted earlier than VMVFX: CWGFX (25 years) vs VMVFX (13 years). CWGFX (0.79) is less costly to investors than VMVFX (0.21). CWGFX (44.00) and VMVFX (43.00) have comparable annual turnover. CWGFX has a lower initial minimum investment than VMVFX: CWGFX (250) vs VMVFX (3000). CWGFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.55 vs. VMVFX (5.02). CWGFX return over 5 years is better than : 32.96 vs. VMVFX (18.81).
| CWGFX | VMVFX | CWGFX / VMVFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.21 | 376% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.21 | 376% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.986 | 10.336 | 135% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 3000 | 8% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 158B | 2B | 7,888% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.31 | 2.11 | 62% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.55 | 5.02 | 310% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.96 | 25.23 | 174% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.96 | 18.81 | 175% |
| Returns for 10 years | 93.69 | 49.03 | 191% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers