CWH
Price
$17.52
Change
+$0.23 (+1.33%)
Updated
Sep 18, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.09B
47 days until earnings call
PAG
Price
$178.61
Change
+$0.80 (+0.45%)
Updated
Sep 18, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
11.76B
34 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CWH vs PAG

Header iconCWH vs PAG Comparison
Open Charts CWH vs PAGBanner chart's image
Camping World Holdings
Price$17.52
Change+$0.23 (+1.33%)
Volume$12.49K
Capitalization1.09B
Penske Automotive Group
Price$178.61
Change+$0.80 (+0.45%)
Volume$351
Capitalization11.76B
CWH vs PAG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CWH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PAG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CWH vs. PAG commentary
Sep 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWH is a StrongBuy and PAG is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 18, 2025
Stock price -- (CWH: $17.28 vs. PAG: $177.81)
Brand notoriety: CWH and PAG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Automotive Aftermarket industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CWH: 111% vs. PAG: 73%
Market capitalization -- CWH: $1.09B vs. PAG: $11.76B
CWH [@Automotive Aftermarket] is valued at $1.09B. PAG’s [@Automotive Aftermarket] market capitalization is $11.76B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Automotive Aftermarket] industry ranges from $50.34B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Automotive Aftermarket] industry is $4.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CWH’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePAG’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CWH’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PAG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, PAG is a better buy in the long-term than CWH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CWH’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PAG’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CWH’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • PAG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CWH is a better buy in the short-term than PAG.

Price Growth

CWH (@Automotive Aftermarket) experienced а +3.26% price change this week, while PAG (@Automotive Aftermarket) price change was -3.48% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Automotive Aftermarket industry was -0.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.93%.

Reported Earning Dates

CWH is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.

PAG is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Automotive Aftermarket (-0.26% weekly)

The Automotive Aftermarket consists of the manufacturing, remanufacturing, distribution, retailing, and installation of vehicle parts and accessories, after the sale of the automobile by the original equipment manufacturer (OEM) to the consumer. The aftermarket parts many not be manufactured by the OEM. According to a Technavio study, the US automotive parts aftermarket size is estimated to grow by USD 24.33 billion during 2018-2022 (CAGR 3%). Like many other industries, the automotive aftermarket is also being intensely penetrated by the digital boom. The online auto parts sales market is predicted to exceed $13B by 2020 (according to a study by Mirakl).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PAG($11.8B) has a higher market cap than CWH($1.09B). CWH has higher P/E ratio than PAG: CWH (36.55) vs PAG (12.37). PAG YTD gains are higher at: 19.300 vs. CWH (-16.204). PAG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.73B vs. CWH (282M). CWH has less debt than PAG: CWH (3.73B) vs PAG (8.41B). PAG has higher revenues than CWH: PAG (30.6B) vs CWH (6.32B).
CWHPAGCWH / PAG
Capitalization1.09B11.8B9%
EBITDA282M1.73B16%
Gain YTD-16.20419.300-84%
P/E Ratio36.5512.37295%
Revenue6.32B30.6B21%
Total CashN/A155M-
Total Debt3.73B8.41B44%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CWH vs PAG: Fundamental Ratings
CWH
PAG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1266
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
21
Undervalued
30
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1005
SMR RATING
1..100
9349
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6051
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
339
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CWH's Valuation (21) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as PAG (30). This means that CWH’s stock grew similarly to PAG’s over the last 12 months.

PAG's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the Specialty Stores industry is significantly better than the same rating for CWH (100). This means that PAG’s stock grew significantly faster than CWH’s over the last 12 months.

PAG's SMR Rating (49) in the Specialty Stores industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CWH (93). This means that PAG’s stock grew somewhat faster than CWH’s over the last 12 months.

PAG's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as CWH (60). This means that PAG’s stock grew similarly to CWH’s over the last 12 months.

CWH's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the Specialty Stores industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PAG (39). This means that CWH’s stock grew somewhat faster than PAG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CWHPAG
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 29 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CWH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PAG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CHIQ24.210.51
+2.15%
Global X MSCI China Consumer Disc ETF
RND29.240.35
+1.20%
First Trust Bloomberg R&D Leaders ETF
PDCC16.990.02
+0.13%
Pearl Diver Credit Company Inc.
CGIE33.62-0.11
-0.33%
Capital Group International Equity ETF
PAWZ56.60-0.29
-0.51%
ProShares Pet Care ETF

CWH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CWH has been loosely correlated with HZO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CWH jumps, then HZO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CWH
1D Price
Change %
CWH100%
-0.69%
HZO - CWH
58%
Loosely correlated
-2.13%
RH - CWH
58%
Loosely correlated
-0.52%
AN - CWH
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.27%
ABG - CWH
57%
Loosely correlated
-0.08%
RUSHB - CWH
55%
Loosely correlated
-2.24%
More

PAG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAG has been closely correlated with GPI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PAG jumps, then GPI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PAG
1D Price
Change %
PAG100%
-0.16%
GPI - PAG
85%
Closely correlated
+0.00%
SAH - PAG
83%
Closely correlated
-1.64%
ABG - PAG
82%
Closely correlated
-0.08%
AN - PAG
82%
Closely correlated
+0.27%
LAD - PAG
71%
Closely correlated
+0.30%
More