CWH
Price
$16.18
Change
+$0.02 (+0.12%)
Updated
Apr 1, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.26B
34 days until earnings call
RH
Price
$239.06
Change
+$4.65 (+1.98%)
Updated
Apr 1 closing price
Capitalization
6.38B
Earnings call today
Ad is loading...

CWH vs RH

Header iconCWH vs RH Comparison
Open Charts CWH vs RHBanner chart's image
Camping World Holdings
Price$16.18
Change+$0.02 (+0.12%)
Volume$13.47K
Capitalization1.26B
RH
Price$239.06
Change+$4.65 (+1.98%)
Volume$773.38K
Capitalization6.38B
CWH vs RH Comparison Chart
Loading...
CWH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CWH vs. RH commentary
Apr 02, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWH is a Buy and RH is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 02, 2025
Stock price -- (CWH: $16.16 vs. RH: $234.41)
Brand notoriety: CWH: Not notable vs. RH: Notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CWH: 131% vs. RH: 120%
Market capitalization -- CWH: $1.26B vs. RH: $6.38B
CWH [@Specialty Stores] is valued at $1.26B. RH’s [@Specialty Stores] market capitalization is $6.38B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $380.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $9.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CWH’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileRH’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CWH’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • RH’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CWH is a better buy in the long-term than RH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CWH’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RH’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CWH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • RH’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RH is a better buy in the short-term than CWH.

Price Growth

CWH (@Specialty Stores) experienced а -8.86% price change this week, while RH (@Specialty Stores) price change was -9.09% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was -3.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.18%.

Reported Earning Dates

CWH is expected to report earnings on May 06, 2025.

RH is expected to report earnings on Jun 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Stores (-3.31% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RH($6.38B) has a higher market cap than CWH($1.26B). RH has higher P/E ratio than CWH: RH (56.64) vs CWH (50.82). CWH YTD gains are higher at: -22.739 vs. RH (-40.443). RH has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 524M vs. CWH (336M). RH has more cash in the bank: 124M vs. CWH (39.6M). RH (3.72B) and CWH (3.86B) have identical debt. CWH has higher revenues than RH: CWH (6.23B) vs RH (3.03B).
CWHRHCWH / RH
Capitalization1.26B6.38B20%
EBITDA336M524M64%
Gain YTD-22.739-40.44356%
P/E Ratio50.8256.6490%
Revenue6.23B3.03B206%
Total Cash39.6M124M32%
Total Debt3.86B3.72B104%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CWH vs RH: Fundamental Ratings
CWH
RH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5454
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
17
Undervalued
81
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6685
SMR RATING
1..100
9432
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8892
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
231
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CWH's Valuation (17) in the Specialty Stores industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RH (81). This means that CWH’s stock grew somewhat faster than RH’s over the last 12 months.

CWH's Profit vs Risk Rating (66) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as RH (85). This means that CWH’s stock grew similarly to RH’s over the last 12 months.

RH's SMR Rating (32) in the Specialty Stores industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CWH (94). This means that RH’s stock grew somewhat faster than CWH’s over the last 12 months.

CWH's Price Growth Rating (88) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as RH (92). This means that CWH’s stock grew similarly to RH’s over the last 12 months.

CWH's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as RH (31). This means that CWH’s stock grew similarly to RH’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CWHRH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CWH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MVCCX27.520.19
+0.70%
MFS Mid Cap Value C
PSICX40.36N/A
N/A
PGIM Quant Solutions Large-Cap Index C
NAMAX13.27N/A
N/A
Columbia Select Mid Cap Value Instl
LKSCX19.40N/A
N/A
LKCM Small Cap Equity Instl
MIEDX8.38N/A
N/A
MassMutual International Eq R5

CWH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CWH has been loosely correlated with ABG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CWH jumps, then ABG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CWH
1D Price
Change %
CWH100%
-1.40%
ABG - CWH
60%
Loosely correlated
+1.22%
AN - CWH
60%
Loosely correlated
+1.79%
KMX - CWH
57%
Loosely correlated
+2.54%
HZO - CWH
57%
Loosely correlated
-2.32%
RUSHB - CWH
56%
Loosely correlated
-1.33%
More