CWK
Price
$15.73
Change
-$0.11 (-0.69%)
Updated
Aug 29, 01:37 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.67B
62 days until earnings call
FRPH
Price
$25.83
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
493.59M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CWK vs FRPH

Header iconCWK vs FRPH Comparison
Open Charts CWK vs FRPHBanner chart's image
Cushman & Wakefield
Price$15.73
Change-$0.11 (-0.69%)
Volume$400
Capitalization3.67B
FRP Holdings
Price$25.83
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$48.5K
Capitalization493.59M
CWK vs FRPH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CWK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FRPH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CWK vs. FRPH commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWK is a Buy and FRPH is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (CWK: $15.84 vs. FRPH: $25.83)
Brand notoriety: CWK and FRPH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CWK: 59% vs. FRPH: 107%
Market capitalization -- CWK: $3.67B vs. FRPH: $493.59M
CWK [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $3.67B. FRPH’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $493.59M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $4.35B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CWK’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFRPH’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CWK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FRPH’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CWK is a better buy in the long-term than FRPH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CWK’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FRPH’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CWK’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FRPH’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CWK and FRPH are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CWK (@Real Estate Development) experienced а +6.88% price change this week, while FRPH (@Real Estate Development) price change was +0.86% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +3.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.35%.

Reported Earning Dates

CWK is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (+3.97% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWK($3.67B) has a higher market cap than FRPH($494M). FRPH has higher P/E ratio than CWK: FRPH (92.25) vs CWK (18.00). CWK YTD gains are higher at: 21.101 vs. FRPH (-15.671). CWK has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 665M vs. FRPH (20.5M). CWK has more cash in the bank: 618M vs. FRPH (153M). FRPH has less debt than CWK: FRPH (180M) vs CWK (3.24B). CWK has higher revenues than FRPH: CWK (9.74B) vs FRPH (42.3M).
CWKFRPHCWK / FRPH
Capitalization3.67B494M742%
EBITDA665M20.5M3,244%
Gain YTD21.101-15.671-135%
P/E Ratio18.0092.2520%
Revenue9.74B42.3M23,031%
Total Cash618M153M404%
Total Debt3.24B180M1,801%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CWK vs FRPH: Fundamental Ratings
CWK
FRPH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7258
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
94
Overvalued
87
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7453
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3778
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5030

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FRPH's Valuation (87) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as CWK (94). This means that FRPH’s stock grew similarly to CWK’s over the last 12 months.

FRPH's Profit vs Risk Rating (53) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as CWK (74). This means that FRPH’s stock grew similarly to CWK’s over the last 12 months.

FRPH's SMR Rating (100) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as CWK (100). This means that FRPH’s stock grew similarly to CWK’s over the last 12 months.

CWK's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Real Estate Development industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FRPH (78). This means that CWK’s stock grew somewhat faster than FRPH’s over the last 12 months.

CWK's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as FRPH (100). This means that CWK’s stock grew similarly to FRPH’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CWKFRPH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
38%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
51%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
49%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CWK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FRPH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VVORX22.58N/A
N/A
Invesco Value Opportunities R
PRPAX5.90N/A
N/A
PGIM Jennison Energy Infrastructure A
DMIDX29.52N/A
N/A
BNY Mellon MidCap Index I
GPGCX18.82N/A
N/A
Grandeur Peak Global Contrarian Instl
UIVQX13.03N/A
N/A
MFS Intrinsic Value R4

FRPH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRPH has been loosely correlated with MMI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FRPH jumps, then MMI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRPH
1D Price
Change %
FRPH100%
N/A
MMI - FRPH
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.34%
KW - FRPH
54%
Loosely correlated
+1.27%
CWK - FRPH
49%
Loosely correlated
-0.75%
MLP - FRPH
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.99%
NMRK - FRPH
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.82%
More