CWLPF
Price
$0.57
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 18 closing price
Capitalization
16.63M
RANJY
Price
$24.70
Change
+$0.36 (+1.48%)
Updated
Jul 18 closing price
Capitalization
10.68B
3 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CWLPF vs RANJY

Header iconCWLPF vs RANJY Comparison
Open Charts CWLPF vs RANJYBanner chart's image
Caldwell Partners International
Price$0.57
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$18.25K
Capitalization16.63M
Randstad
Price$24.70
Change+$0.36 (+1.48%)
Volume$2.17K
Capitalization10.68B
CWLPF vs RANJY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CWLPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RANJY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CWLPF vs. RANJY commentary
Jul 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWLPF is a Hold and RANJY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 20, 2025
Stock price -- (CWLPF: $0.57 vs. RANJY: $24.70)
Brand notoriety: CWLPF and RANJY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Personnel Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CWLPF: 127% vs. RANJY: 47%
Market capitalization -- CWLPF: $16.63M vs. RANJY: $10.68B
CWLPF [@Personnel Services] is valued at $16.63M. RANJY’s [@Personnel Services] market capitalization is $10.68B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Personnel Services] industry ranges from $10.68B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Personnel Services] industry is $2.67B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CWLPF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRANJY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CWLPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RANJY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, RANJY is a better buy in the long-term than CWLPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CWLPF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RANJY’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CWLPF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • RANJY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RANJY is a better buy in the short-term than CWLPF.

Price Growth

CWLPF (@Personnel Services) experienced а -5.35% price change this week, while RANJY (@Personnel Services) price change was +1.73% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Personnel Services industry was +0.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.94%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.60%.

Reported Earning Dates

RANJY is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Personnel Services (+0.57% weekly)

Personnel Services comprise companies that provide staffing and human resources management solutions for businesses. Each company might be involved in one or more types of recruitment or employee solutions such as permanent or temporary staffing, career consulting, outsourcing, administrative services and many more. Some personnel services companies cater to large businesses, while some specialize in providing services to small/medium-sized organizations. These specialized services potentially expedite the process of getting the ‘right’ candidates and/or training them to meet the requirements of a business process. Some of the companies also cover other critical areas like internal auditing for a company. Robert Half International Inc., ManpowerGroup Inc. and Insperity, Inc. are examples of companies in the personnel services industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RANJY($10.7B) has a higher market cap than CWLPF($16.6M). RANJY has higher P/E ratio than CWLPF: RANJY (11.98) vs CWLPF (4.14). RANJY YTD gains are higher at: 27.357 vs. CWLPF (-34.612). RANJY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.38B vs. CWLPF (11.9M). RANJY has more cash in the bank: 301M vs. CWLPF (16.3M). CWLPF has less debt than RANJY: CWLPF (5.31M) vs RANJY (1.51B). RANJY has higher revenues than CWLPF: RANJY (27B) vs CWLPF (162M).
CWLPFRANJYCWLPF / RANJY
Capitalization16.6M10.7B0%
EBITDA11.9M1.38B1%
Gain YTD-34.61227.357-127%
P/E Ratio4.1411.9835%
Revenue162M27B1%
Total Cash16.3M301M5%
Total Debt5.31M1.51B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CWLPF vs RANJY: Fundamental Ratings
CWLPF
RANJY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
53
Fair valued
28
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10051
SMR RATING
1..100
8787
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6342
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
22
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
1750

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RANJY's Valuation (28) in the null industry is in the same range as CWLPF (53). This means that RANJY’s stock grew similarly to CWLPF’s over the last 12 months.

RANJY's Profit vs Risk Rating (51) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CWLPF (100). This means that RANJY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CWLPF’s over the last 12 months.

RANJY's SMR Rating (87) in the null industry is in the same range as CWLPF (87). This means that RANJY’s stock grew similarly to CWLPF’s over the last 12 months.

RANJY's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as CWLPF (63). This means that RANJY’s stock grew similarly to CWLPF’s over the last 12 months.

RANJY's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is in the same range as CWLPF (2). This means that RANJY’s stock grew similarly to CWLPF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CWLPFRANJY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
52%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CWLPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RANJY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
APLY13.030.03
+0.23%
YieldMax AAPL Option Income Strategy ETF
EAGG47.020.06
+0.13%
iShares ESG U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
FTDS53.350.06
+0.11%
First Trust Dividend Strength ETF
SAPH56.49N/A
N/A
SAP SE ADRHEDGED SAPH
FDMO77.04-0.01
-0.02%
Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF

CWLPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CWLPF and RANJF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CWLPF and RANJF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CWLPF
1D Price
Change %
CWLPF100%
-0.61%
RANJF - CWLPF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AHEXY - CWLPF
5%
Poorly correlated
+1.26%
RANJY - CWLPF
5%
Poorly correlated
+1.48%
RLBY - CWLPF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HAYPY - CWLPF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

RANJY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RANJY has been closely correlated with AHEXY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RANJY jumps, then AHEXY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RANJY
1D Price
Change %
RANJY100%
+1.48%
AHEXY - RANJY
68%
Closely correlated
+1.26%
MAN - RANJY
56%
Loosely correlated
-2.50%
KFY - RANJY
39%
Loosely correlated
-0.71%
RHI - RANJY
37%
Loosely correlated
-0.69%
HSII - RANJY
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.35%
More