Advertisement
CXM vs FALC
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CXM is a Hold and FALC is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CXM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFALC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CXM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- FALC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CXM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FALC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CXM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- FALC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
CXM (@Packaged Software) experienced а +2.08% price change this week, while FALC (@Packaged Software) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +0.61%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was +49.04%.
Reported Earning Dates
CXM is expected to report earnings on Dec 03, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (+0.61% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| CXM | FALC | CXM / FALC | |
| Capitalization | 1.93B | 12.9M | 14,953% |
| EBITDA | 63.3M | 1.84M | 3,446% |
| Gain YTD | -6.509 | -10.000 | 65% |
| P/E Ratio | 17.95 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 821M | 11.2M | 7,330% |
| Total Cash | 474M | 2.86M | 16,579% |
| Total Debt | 48.2M | 2.33M | 2,073% |
FALC | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 87 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 74 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 55 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| CXM | FALC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 74% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 75% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 70% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 22 days ago 71% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 76% | 21 days ago 71% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 66% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 90% |
Advertisement
CXM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CXM has been loosely correlated with SPT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CXM jumps, then SPT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CXM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CXM | 100% | +0.38% | ||
| SPT - CXM | 59% Loosely correlated | +2.23% | ||
| EVCM - CXM | 56% Loosely correlated | +2.84% | ||
| COIN - CXM | 56% Loosely correlated | +7.04% | ||
| PCOR - CXM | 56% Loosely correlated | +0.17% | ||
| HUBS - CXM | 56% Loosely correlated | +1.15% | ||
More | ||||
FALC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FALC has been loosely correlated with WRDLY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FALC jumps, then WRDLY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FALC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FALC | 100% | N/A | ||
| WRDLY - FALC | 42% Loosely correlated | +1.34% | ||
| WWLNF - FALC | 38% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| CXM - FALC | 27% Poorly correlated | +1.03% | ||
| CREX - FALC | 24% Poorly correlated | -0.43% | ||
| AI - FALC | 20% Poorly correlated | -1.49% | ||
More | ||||