CXM
Price
$7.76
Change
+$0.05 (+0.65%)
Updated
May 2 closing price
Capitalization
3.35B
36 days until earnings call
FALC
Price
$1.29
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Apr 30 closing price
Capitalization
9.61M
Ad is loading...

CXM vs FALC

Header iconCXM vs FALC Comparison
Open Charts CXM vs FALCBanner chart's image
Sprinklr
Price$7.76
Change+$0.05 (+0.65%)
Volume$721.06K
Capitalization3.35B
FalconStor Software
Price$1.29
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.41K
Capitalization9.61M
CXM vs FALC Comparison Chart
Loading...
CXM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CXM vs. FALC commentary
May 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CXM is a Hold and FALC is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 05, 2025
Stock price -- (CXM: $7.76 vs. FALC: $1.29)
Brand notoriety: CXM and FALC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CXM: 37% vs. FALC: 121%
Market capitalization -- CXM: $3.35B vs. FALC: $9.61M
CXM [@Packaged Software] is valued at $3.35B. FALC’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $9.61M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.32B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CXM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFALC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CXM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FALC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CXM is a better buy in the long-term than FALC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CXM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • CXM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

CXM (@Packaged Software) experienced а +1.31% price change this week, while FALC (@Packaged Software) price change was +5.74% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +2.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.23%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.16%.

Reported Earning Dates

CXM is expected to report earnings on Sep 03, 2025.

FALC is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+2.40% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CXM($3.35B) has a higher market cap than FALC($9.62M). CXM YTD gains are higher at: -8.166 vs. FALC (-35.500). CXM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 49.4M vs. FALC (-382.26K). CXM has more cash in the bank: 663M vs. FALC (1.84M). FALC has less debt than CXM: FALC (2.28M) vs CXM (33.3M). CXM has higher revenues than FALC: CXM (732M) vs FALC (10.3M).
CXMFALCCXM / FALC
Capitalization3.35B9.62M34,862%
EBITDA49.4M-382.26K-12,923%
Gain YTD-8.166-35.50023%
P/E Ratio67.67N/A-
Revenue732M10.3M7,107%
Total Cash663M1.84M36,052%
Total Debt33.3M2.28M1,458%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FALC: Fundamental Ratings
FALC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
80
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
84
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
59
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CXM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CXM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PRWLX14.760.28
+1.93%
Principal Diversified Intl A
AVLVX13.620.25
+1.87%
Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value Inst
VIMAX323.115.14
+1.62%
Vanguard Mid Cap Index Admiral
CRQSX12.320.18
+1.48%
Catholic Rspnsbl Invst Equity Idx Ins
JIAIX9.090.04
+0.44%
JHancock Multi-Asset High Income I

CXM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CXM has been loosely correlated with COIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CXM jumps, then COIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CXM
1D Price
Change %
CXM100%
+0.65%
COIN - CXM
56%
Loosely correlated
+1.80%
CLSK - CXM
53%
Loosely correlated
+1.61%
AMPL - CXM
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.64%
EVCM - CXM
51%
Loosely correlated
+3.31%
HUBS - CXM
50%
Loosely correlated
+1.88%
More

FALC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FALC has been loosely correlated with WRDLY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FALC jumps, then WRDLY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FALC
1D Price
Change %
FALC100%
N/A
WRDLY - FALC
42%
Loosely correlated
+1.46%
WWLNF - FALC
38%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CXM - FALC
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.65%
CREX - FALC
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.54%
AI - FALC
20%
Poorly correlated
+2.98%
More