CXM
Price
$5.34
Change
-$0.04 (-0.74%)
Updated
Jun 12 closing price
Capitalization
1.25B
86 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FRSH
Price
$9.49
Change
+$0.05 (+0.53%)
Updated
Jun 15, 11:28 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.61B
50 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CXM vs FRSH

Header iconCXM vs FRSH Comparison
Open Charts CXM vs FRSHBanner chart's image
CXM vs FRSH Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CXM vs. FRSH commentary
Jun 15, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CXM is a Hold and FRSH is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 15, 2026
Stock price -- (CXM: $5.34 vs. FRSH: $9.44)
Brand notoriety: CXM and FRSH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CXM: 77% vs. FRSH: 81%
Market capitalization -- CXM: $1.25B vs. FRSH: $2.61B
CXM [@Packaged Software] is valued at $1.25B. FRSH’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $2.61B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $195.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $8.46B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CXM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFRSH’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CXM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FRSH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FRSH is a better buy in the long-term than CXM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CXM’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FRSH’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CXM’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • FRSH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FRSH is a better buy in the short-term than CXM.

Price Growth

CXM (@Packaged Software) experienced а -0.74% price change this week, while FRSH (@Packaged Software) price change was -0.05% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -2.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.37%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.09%.

Reported Earning Dates

CXM is expected to report earnings on Sep 09, 2026.

FRSH is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-2.27% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRSH($2.61B) has a higher market cap than CXM($1.25B). CXM has higher P/E ratio than FRSH: CXM (44.50) vs FRSH (15.37). FRSH YTD gains are higher at: -22.898 vs. CXM (-31.362). CXM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 71.1M vs. FRSH (42.9M). FRSH has more cash in the bank: 779M vs. CXM (443M). FRSH has less debt than CXM: FRSH (38.8M) vs CXM (43.8M). CXM (871M) and FRSH (871M) have equivalent revenues.
CXMFRSHCXM / FRSH
Capitalization1.25B2.61B48%
EBITDA71.1M42.9M166%
Gain YTD-31.362-22.898137%
P/E Ratio44.5015.37289%
Revenue871M871M100%
Total Cash443M779M57%
Total Debt43.8M38.8M113%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FRSH: Fundamental Ratings
FRSH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
84
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
58
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
91
SMR RATING
1..100
51
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
55
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
27
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
15

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CXMFRSH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
80%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CXM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FRSH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
XNTK369.052.53
+0.69%
State Street® SPDR® NYSE Technology ETF
CBLS32.79N/A
N/A
Clough Hedged Equity ETF
LVLN24.61-0.02
-0.10%
State Street SPDR S&P Leveraged Ln ETF
NBH10.39-0.06
-0.57%
Neuberger Municipal Fund Inc.
AIBD5.39-0.12
-2.18%
Direxion Daily AI And Big Data Bear 2X

CXM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CXM has been closely correlated with FRSH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CXM jumps, then FRSH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CXM
1D Price
Change %
CXM100%
-0.74%
FRSH - CXM
67%
Closely correlated
+2.44%
BL - CXM
65%
Loosely correlated
+2.86%
SPT - CXM
64%
Loosely correlated
+2.39%
DOCU - CXM
62%
Loosely correlated
+1.08%
ASAN - CXM
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.94%
More