Advertisement
CYCU vs SHAZ
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CYCU is a Hold and SHAZ is a StrongBuy.
| CYCU | SHAZ | CYCU / SHAZ | |
| Capitalization | 86.3M | 2.13B | 4% |
| EBITDA | -13.69M | -463.46M | 3% |
| Gain YTD | -84.918 | 3026.842 | -3% |
| P/E Ratio | 0.19 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 14.4M | 3.09M | 466% |
| Total Cash | 1.87M | 1.86B | 0% |
| Total Debt | 8.59M | 1.01B | 1% |
| CYCU | SHAZ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 14% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 41% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 40% | 2 days ago 25% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 35% | 2 days ago 43% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | 2 days ago 43% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 43% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 26 days ago 64% | 5 days ago 62% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 53% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 37% | 2 days ago 16% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 26% | 2 days ago 43% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CYCU’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while SHAZ’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CYCU’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- SHAZ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CYCU’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SHAZ’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CYCU’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
- SHAZ’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
CYCU (@Information Technology Services) experienced а -5.93% price change this week, while SHAZ (@Information Technology Services) price change was +6.20% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Information Technology Services industry was -3.76%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.97%.
Reported Earning Dates
CYCU is expected to report earnings on Nov 13, 2026.
SHAZ is expected to report earnings on Dec 02, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Information Technology Services (-3.76% weekly)The industry, whose total market cap runs into trillions, makes hardware/software that allows data to be stored, retrieved, transmitted, and manipulated on computers. With the ever-increasing relevance of data, the information technology (IT) industry has gained momentous growth over the years, and continues to thrive on innovation. Some of the behemoths in the industry are International Business Machines Corporation, Accenture, and VMware, Inc.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| CTEC | 58.53 | 0.73 | +1.27% |
| Global X ClimateTech ETF | |||
| RGLO | 33.47 | 0.22 | +0.67% |
| Russell Inv Global Equity ETF | |||
| TCAL | 22.35 | 0.07 | +0.31% |
| T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Premium Income ETF | |||
| ALLW | 29.59 | 0.01 | +0.03% |
| State Street® Bridgewater®AllWeather®ETF | |||
| LCLG | 68.79 | N/A | N/A |
| Logan Capital Large Cap Growth ETF | |||
CYCU and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CYCU and VNET have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CYCU and VNET's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CYCU | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CYCU | 100% | -4.86% | ||
| VNET - CYCU | 27% Poorly correlated | -0.78% | ||
| KEEL - CYCU | 23% Poorly correlated | +3.78% | ||
| APLD - CYCU | 21% Poorly correlated | +2.48% | ||
| WYFI - CYCU | 20% Poorly correlated | +3.29% | ||
| UIS - CYCU | 20% Poorly correlated | +0.41% | ||
More | ||||
SHAZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SHAZ and CHRN have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SHAZ and CHRN's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SHAZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SHAZ | 100% | +5.02% | ||
| CHRN - SHAZ | 8% Poorly correlated | +5.73% | ||
| DAIC - SHAZ | 7% Poorly correlated | -8.99% | ||
| WYFI - SHAZ | 5% Poorly correlated | +3.29% | ||
| FIS - SHAZ | 3% Poorly correlated | +0.16% | ||
| CYCU - SHAZ | 2% Poorly correlated | -4.86% | ||
More | ||||