Advertisement
CYD vs XPEV
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CYD is a Hold and XPEV is a Buy.
CYD | XPEV | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 73 | 62 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 9 Undervalued | 40 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 55 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 59 | 94 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 81 | 86 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 93 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CYD's Valuation (9) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry is in the same range as XPEV (40) in the null industry. This means that CYD’s stock grew similarly to XPEV’s over the last 12 months.
CYD's Profit vs Risk Rating (55) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry is somewhat better than the same rating for XPEV (100) in the null industry. This means that CYD’s stock grew somewhat faster than XPEV’s over the last 12 months.
CYD's SMR Rating (59) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry is somewhat better than the same rating for XPEV (94) in the null industry. This means that CYD’s stock grew somewhat faster than XPEV’s over the last 12 months.
CYD's Price Growth Rating (81) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry is in the same range as XPEV (86) in the null industry. This means that CYD’s stock grew similarly to XPEV’s over the last 12 months.
CYD's P/E Growth Rating (93) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry is in the same range as XPEV (100) in the null industry. This means that CYD’s stock grew similarly to XPEV’s over the last 12 months.
| CYD | XPEV | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 7 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 75% | 13 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 78% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CYD’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while XPEV’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CYD’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- XPEV’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CYD’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while XPEV’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CYD’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
- XPEV’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CYD (@Motor Vehicles) experienced а -6.96% price change this week, while XPEV (@Motor Vehicles) price change was -9.64% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Motor Vehicles industry was -7.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -18.63%, and the average quarterly price growth was -25.94%.
Reported Earning Dates
CYD is expected to report earnings on Nov 16, 2026.
XPEV is expected to report earnings on Nov 24, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Motor Vehicles (-7.43% weekly)Automobiles continue to be arguably the most popular form of passenger travel in the U.S., and major automobile makers have revenues and market capitalizations running into multi-billions. In recent years, the industry has been experiencing some path-breaking innovations like electric vehicles and self-driving technology. While there are long-standing companies like General Motors, Ford, and Toyota Motors operating in this space, there are also emerging/rapidly growing players like Tesla – which has had a major role in the growing popularity of the electric vehicle market. With technological advancements taking steam in the auto space, we’ve also witnessed collaborations (or talks of potential partnerships) of carmakers with tech behemoths like Google’s subsidiary, Waymo.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| CRYPTO / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| AST.X | 0.008179 | 0.002212 | +37.07% |
| AirSwap cryptocurrency | |||
| WIF.X | 0.239947 | 0.005637 | +2.41% |
| dogwifhat cryptocurrency | |||
| RARE.X | 0.018071 | 0.000247 | +1.39% |
| SuperRare cryptocurrency | |||
| ETH.X | 2676.722200 | -11.946533 | -0.44% |
| Ethereum cryptocurrency | |||
| PEOPLE.X | 0.009373 | -0.000048 | -0.51% |
| ConstitutionDAO cryptocurrency | |||
CYD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CYD has been loosely correlated with TNC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CYD jumps, then TNC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CYD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CYD | 100% | +0.52% | ||
| TNC - CYD | 34% Loosely correlated | -1.26% | ||
| CXT - CYD | 33% Poorly correlated | -1.05% | ||
| ENOV - CYD | 30% Poorly correlated | +1.65% | ||
| LXFR - CYD | 28% Poorly correlated | -0.06% | ||
| HLMN - CYD | 27% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
XPEV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XPEV has been loosely correlated with NIO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if XPEV jumps, then NIO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To XPEV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XPEV | 100% | -4.82% | ||
| NIO - XPEV | 55% Loosely correlated | -5.29% | ||
| TSLA - XPEV | 29% Poorly correlated | -1.29% | ||
| TM - XPEV | 28% Poorly correlated | -0.84% | ||
| CYD - XPEV | 26% Poorly correlated | +0.52% | ||
| F - XPEV | 23% Poorly correlated | -0.65% | ||
More | ||||