Advertisement
CYD vs HLMN
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CYD is a Buy and HLMN is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CYD’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileHLMN’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CYD’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- HLMN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CYD’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HLMN’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CYD’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- HLMN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CYD (@Motor Vehicles) experienced а -2.40% price change this week, while HLMN (@Tools & Hardware) price change was -0.64% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Motor Vehicles industry was -4.45%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -10.55%, and the average quarterly price growth was -19.62%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Tools & Hardware industry was +0.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.80%.
Reported Earning Dates
CYD is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2026.
HLMN is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Motor Vehicles (-4.45% weekly)Automobiles continue to be arguably the most popular form of passenger travel in the U.S., and major automobile makers have revenues and market capitalizations running into multi-billions. In recent years, the industry has been experiencing some path-breaking innovations like electric vehicles and self-driving technology. While there are long-standing companies like General Motors, Ford, and Toyota Motors operating in this space, there are also emerging/rapidly growing players like Tesla – which has had a major role in the growing popularity of the electric vehicle market. With technological advancements taking steam in the auto space, we’ve also witnessed collaborations (or talks of potential partnerships) of carmakers with tech behemoths like Google’s subsidiary, Waymo.
@Tools & Hardware (+0.20% weekly)Tools & Hardware industry includes companies that manufacture security products, storage cabinets, steel rules and tapes, calipers, shoe hook fasteners, lumber, structural materials and other related supplies. Stanley Black & Decker, Inc., Snap-on Incorporated and L.S. Starrett Company are some of the largest, established players in this industry. The industry is also seeing rapid growth in online sales. The proliferation of do-it-yourself (DIY) projects has boosted industry demand. But oil price volatility poses potential risks to this industry, particularly to e-commerce companies which spend on services of shipping companies, which might alter charges based on oil price movements.
| CYD | HLMN | CYD / HLMN | |
| Capitalization | 1.85B | 1.53B | 121% |
| EBITDA | 898M | 250M | 359% |
| Gain YTD | 37.606 | -8.891 | -423% |
| P/E Ratio | 23.10 | 43.83 | 53% |
| Revenue | 22.6B | 1.56B | 1,446% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 27.7M | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | 812M | - |
CYD | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 89 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 17 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 25 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 82 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 40 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 32 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 2 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| CYD | HLMN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 66% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 71% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 70% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 73% | 9 days ago 68% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 70% | 7 days ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 66% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| TFNS | 27.52 | 0.13 | +0.47% |
| T. Rowe Price Financials ETF | |||
| SIOO | 19.77 | -0.02 | -0.11% |
| VistaShares Target 15TM S&P 100 Dis ETF | |||
| HIDV | 87.72 | -0.55 | -0.62% |
| AB US High Dividend ETF | |||
| PEY | 22.47 | -0.26 | -1.17% |
| Invesco High Yield Eq Div Achiev™ ETF | |||
| EGUS | 57.97 | -0.70 | -1.19% |
| iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Growth ETF | |||
CYD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CYD has been loosely correlated with TNC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CYD jumps, then TNC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CYD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CYD | 100% | +0.31% | ||
| TNC - CYD | 34% Loosely correlated | -0.66% | ||
| CXT - CYD | 33% Poorly correlated | -2.79% | ||
| ENOV - CYD | 30% Poorly correlated | -3.05% | ||
| LXFR - CYD | 28% Poorly correlated | -0.68% | ||
| HLMN - CYD | 27% Poorly correlated | -2.11% | ||
More | ||||
HLMN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HLMN has been closely correlated with HLIO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HLMN jumps, then HLIO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HLMN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HLMN | 100% | -2.11% | ||
| HLIO - HLMN | 71% Closely correlated | +2.12% | ||
| DCI - HLMN | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.50% | ||
| GGG - HLMN | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.68% | ||
| NDSN - HLMN | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.29% | ||
| PNR - HLMN | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.39% | ||
More | ||||