It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CYRX’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHUBG’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CYRX’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HUBG’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
CYRX (@Air Freight/Couriers) experienced а -9.57% price change this week, while HUBG (@Air Freight/Couriers) price change was +2.67% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Air Freight/Couriers industry was +3.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.05%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.61%.
CYRX is expected to report earnings on Mar 06, 2025.
HUBG is expected to report earnings on Jan 30, 2025.
The Air Freight/Couriers industry operates air transportation and recurring delivery services. This includes companies offering same-day deliveries, scheduled delivery and logistical services. The proliferation of e-commerce/online retail with a growing emphasis on faster delivery has expanded opportunities for this industry, and induced more competition. United Parcel Service, Inc., FedEx Corporation and Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. are some of the major companies in this industry.
CYRX | HUBG | CYRX / HUBG | |
Capitalization | 886M | 2.63B | 34% |
EBITDA | -66.36M | 407M | -16% |
Gain YTD | -54.874 | 8.958 | -613% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | 15.96 | - |
Revenue | 233M | 4.2B | 6% |
Total Cash | 457M | 187M | 244% |
Total Debt | 416M | 576M | 72% |
CYRX | HUBG | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 61 | 7 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 99 Overvalued | 90 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 18 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 95 | 77 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 85 | 42 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 7 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 39 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
HUBG's Valuation (90) in the Air Freight Or Couriers industry is in the same range as CYRX (99). This means that HUBG’s stock grew similarly to CYRX’s over the last 12 months.
HUBG's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the Air Freight Or Couriers industry is significantly better than the same rating for CYRX (100). This means that HUBG’s stock grew significantly faster than CYRX’s over the last 12 months.
HUBG's SMR Rating (77) in the Air Freight Or Couriers industry is in the same range as CYRX (95). This means that HUBG’s stock grew similarly to CYRX’s over the last 12 months.
HUBG's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Air Freight Or Couriers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CYRX (85). This means that HUBG’s stock grew somewhat faster than CYRX’s over the last 12 months.
HUBG's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the Air Freight Or Couriers industry is significantly better than the same rating for CYRX (100). This means that HUBG’s stock grew significantly faster than CYRX’s over the last 12 months.
CYRX | HUBG | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 7 days ago68% | 4 days ago81% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago84% | 4 days ago65% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago85% | 4 days ago73% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago82% | 4 days ago77% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago86% | 4 days ago67% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago88% | 4 days ago65% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 14 days ago82% | 8 days ago68% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago88% | 4 days ago64% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago88% | 4 days ago70% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago82% | 4 days ago72% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
TQMVX | 19.43 | -0.03 | -0.15% |
T. Rowe Price Integrated US LCV Eq | |||
HAOSX | 13.12 | -0.08 | -0.61% |
Harbor International Core Institutional | |||
BREAX | 31.78 | -0.27 | -0.84% |
BlackRock International Dividend Inv A | |||
FTXSX | 46.82 | -0.75 | -1.58% |
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp GrInstl | |||
PGBGX | 47.08 | -0.97 | -2.02% |
Principal Blue Chip R5 |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CYRX has been loosely correlated with XPO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CYRX jumps, then XPO could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CYRX | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CYRX | 100% | -5.28% | ||
XPO - CYRX | 51% Loosely correlated | -2.11% | ||
HUBG - CYRX | 37% Loosely correlated | -0.44% | ||
GXO - CYRX | 33% Loosely correlated | -1.84% | ||
LSTR - CYRX | 30% Poorly correlated | -2.45% | ||
RLGT - CYRX | 30% Poorly correlated | +3.83% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HUBG has been closely correlated with XPO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HUBG jumps, then XPO could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HUBG | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
HUBG | 100% | -0.44% | ||
XPO - HUBG | 70% Closely correlated | -2.11% | ||
LSTR - HUBG | 69% Closely correlated | -2.45% | ||
JBHT - HUBG | 61% Loosely correlated | -1.17% | ||
GXO - HUBG | 58% Loosely correlated | -1.84% | ||
RLGT - HUBG | 56% Loosely correlated | +3.83% | ||
More |