CZR
Price
$29.56
Change
+$0.06 (+0.20%)
Updated
Oct 12, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
6.03B
15 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FLUT
Price
$78.29
Change
-$1.49 (-1.87%)
Updated
Oct 12, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
13.3B
37 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CZR vs FLUT

CZR vs FLUT Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CZR vs. FLUT commentary
Oct 12, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CZR is a Hold and FLUT is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CZR vs FLUT: Fundamental Ratings
CZR
FLUT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
64
Fair valued
73
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9493
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4586
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
85100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CZR's Valuation (64) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as FLUT (73) in the null industry. This means that CZR’s stock grew similarly to FLUT’s over the last 12 months.

CZR's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as FLUT (100) in the null industry. This means that CZR’s stock grew similarly to FLUT’s over the last 12 months.

FLUT's SMR Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as CZR (94) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry. This means that FLUT’s stock grew similarly to CZR’s over the last 12 months.

CZR's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FLUT (86) in the null industry. This means that CZR’s stock grew somewhat faster than FLUT’s over the last 12 months.

CZR's P/E Growth Rating (85) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as FLUT (100) in the null industry. This means that CZR’s stock grew similarly to FLUT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CZRFLUT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
74%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 12, 2026
Stock price -- (CZR: $29.50 vs. FLUT: $79.78)
Brand notoriety: CZR and FLUT are both not notable
CZR represents the Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines, while FLUT is part of the Casinos/Gaming industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CZR: 111% vs. FLUT: 83%
Market capitalization -- CZR: $6.03B vs. FLUT: $13.3B
CZR [@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines] is valued at $6.03B. FLUT’s [@Casinos/Gaming] market capitalization is $13.3B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines] industry ranges from $514.43K to $25.12B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry ranges from $3.74K to $35.21B. The average market capitalization across the [@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines] industry is $4.34B. The average market capitalization across the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry is $2.92B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CZR’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while FLUT’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CZR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FLUT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CZR is a better buy in the long-term than FLUT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CZR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FLUT’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CZR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FLUT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FLUT is a better buy in the short-term than CZR.

Price Growth

CZR (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) experienced а -0.51% price change this week, while FLUT (@Casinos/Gaming) price change was +6.64% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines industry was -1.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -10.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was -12.96%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Casinos/Gaming industry was -3.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -18.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was -18.01%.

Reported Earning Dates

CZR is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2026.

FLUT is expected to report earnings on Nov 18, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines (-1.97% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate and manage one or more of the following: lodging facilities (e.g. hotels and motels), resorts (e.g. ski resorts), spas, cruise ships and timeshare facilities. Marriott International, Inc., Carnival Corporation, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. and Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. are some of the biggest names in this industry.

@Casinos/Gaming (-3.92% weekly)

Casinos/Gaming includes companies that operate casinos, gaming services, horse racing and harness racing facilities. Think Las Vegas Sands Corp., MGM Resorts International and Wynn Resorts, Ltd. In periods of strong economic growth, consumers tend to spend on discretionary/leisure activities like gambling or games; but consumption is likely to slow down when there’s economic sluggishness.

View a ticker or compare two or three
CZR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FLUT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ADC65.950.13
+0.20%
Agree Realty Corp
BHFAO13.70-0.02
-0.15%
Brighthouse Financial
SAIH25.85-0.15
-0.58%
SAIHEAT Limited
CZFS78.05-1.41
-1.77%
Citizens Financial Services Inc
SNDA35.24-0.72
-2.00%
Sonida Senior Living

CZR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CZR has been loosely correlated with INSE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CZR jumps, then INSE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CZR
1D Price
Change %
CZR100%
-0.07%
INSE - CZR
63%
Loosely correlated
+6.53%
ACEL - CZR
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.90%
DKNG - CZR
55%
Loosely correlated
-1.46%
PENN - CZR
54%
Loosely correlated
-1.78%
CHDN - CZR
53%
Loosely correlated
+4.99%
More

FLUT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLUT has been closely correlated with DKNG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FLUT jumps, then DKNG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLUT
1D Price
Change %
FLUT100%
-2.21%
DKNG - FLUT
71%
Closely correlated
-1.46%
BYD - FLUT
51%
Loosely correlated
-1.53%
PENN - FLUT
49%
Loosely correlated
-1.78%
CZR - FLUT
49%
Loosely correlated
-0.07%
MGM - FLUT
46%
Loosely correlated
-2.47%
More