Advertisement
FLUT vs MGM
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLUT is a Hold and MGM is a Hold.
| FLUT | MGM | FLUT / MGM | |
| Capitalization | 15.5B | 9.51B | 163% |
| EBITDA | 1.62B | 1.99B | 81% |
| Gain YTD | -58.352 | 3.617 | -1,613% |
| P/E Ratio | 114.37 | 22.92 | 499% |
| Revenue | 17.2B | 17.8B | 97% |
| Total Cash | 3.55B | 2.55B | 140% |
| Total Debt | 12.6B | 29.8B | 42% |
FLUT | MGM | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 75 Overvalued | 62 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 93 | 55 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 79 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 27 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 90 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MGM's Valuation (62) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as FLUT (75) in the null industry. This means that MGM’s stock grew similarly to FLUT’s over the last 12 months.
MGM's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as FLUT (100) in the null industry. This means that MGM’s stock grew similarly to FLUT’s over the last 12 months.
MGM's SMR Rating (55) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FLUT (93) in the null industry. This means that MGM’s stock grew somewhat faster than FLUT’s over the last 12 months.
MGM's Price Growth Rating (61) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as FLUT (79) in the null industry. This means that MGM’s stock grew similarly to FLUT’s over the last 12 months.
MGM's P/E Growth Rating (27) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is significantly better than the same rating for FLUT (100) in the null industry. This means that MGM’s stock grew significantly faster than FLUT’s over the last 12 months.
| FLUT | MGM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 64% | 4 days ago 81% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 67% | 4 days ago 70% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% | 4 days ago 73% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 65% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 71% | 4 days ago 70% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 71% | 4 days ago 68% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 68% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 74% | 4 days ago 67% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 71% | 4 days ago 65% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 70% | 4 days ago 69% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FLUT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while MGM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- FLUT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- MGM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FLUT’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MGM’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FLUT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
- MGM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
FLUT (@Casinos/Gaming) experienced а -10.94% price change this week, while MGM (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) price change was -5.21% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Casinos/Gaming industry was -7.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.21%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.92%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines industry was -5.48%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -12.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.00%.
Reported Earning Dates
FLUT is expected to report earnings on Nov 18, 2026.
MGM is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Casinos/Gaming (-7.06% weekly)Casinos/Gaming includes companies that operate casinos, gaming services, horse racing and harness racing facilities. Think Las Vegas Sands Corp., MGM Resorts International and Wynn Resorts, Ltd. In periods of strong economic growth, consumers tend to spend on discretionary/leisure activities like gambling or games; but consumption is likely to slow down when there’s economic sluggishness.
@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines (-5.48% weekly)The industry includes companies that operate and manage one or more of the following: lodging facilities (e.g. hotels and motels), resorts (e.g. ski resorts), spas, cruise ships and timeshare facilities. Marriott International, Inc., Carnival Corporation, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. and Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. are some of the biggest names in this industry.
Advertisement
FLUT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLUT has been closely correlated with DKNG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FLUT jumps, then DKNG could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FLUT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLUT | 100% | -3.18% | ||
| DKNG - FLUT | 72% Closely correlated | -3.20% | ||
| BYD - FLUT | 51% Loosely correlated | -1.72% | ||
| PENN - FLUT | 49% Loosely correlated | -5.78% | ||
| CZR - FLUT | 49% Loosely correlated | -0.10% | ||
| MGM - FLUT | 46% Loosely correlated | -1.31% | ||
More | ||||
MGM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MGM has been loosely correlated with INSE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MGM jumps, then INSE could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MGM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MGM | 100% | -1.31% | ||
| INSE - MGM | 57% Loosely correlated | -4.38% | ||
| BYD - MGM | 53% Loosely correlated | -1.72% | ||
| CZR - MGM | 51% Loosely correlated | -0.10% | ||
| WYNN - MGM | 51% Loosely correlated | -1.54% | ||
| DKNG - MGM | 49% Loosely correlated | -3.20% | ||
More | ||||