DAN
Price
$19.48
Change
-$0.57 (-2.84%)
Updated
Nov 20, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.34B
96 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
QS
Price
$11.73
Change
-$0.73 (-5.86%)
Updated
Nov 20, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
7.49B
90 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

DAN vs QS

Header iconDAN vs QS Comparison
Open Charts DAN vs QSBanner chart's image
Dana
Price$19.48
Change-$0.57 (-2.84%)
Volume$18.7K
Capitalization2.34B
QuantumScape
Price$11.73
Change-$0.73 (-5.86%)
Volume$151.61K
Capitalization7.49B
DAN vs QS Comparison Chart in %
DAN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
QS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DAN vs. QS commentary
Nov 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DAN is a Hold and QS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 20, 2025
Stock price -- (DAN: $20.05 vs. QS: $12.46)
Brand notoriety: DAN and QS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DAN: 80% vs. QS: 50%
Market capitalization -- DAN: $2.34B vs. QS: $7.49B
DAN [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $2.34B. QS’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $7.49B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $83.31B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $6.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DAN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileQS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • DAN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • QS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, DAN is a better buy in the long-term than QS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DAN’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DAN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • QS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, DAN is a better buy in the short-term than QS.

Price Growth

DAN (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а -7.82% price change this week, while QS (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was -14.89% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was -4.45%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.27%.

Reported Earning Dates

DAN is expected to report earnings on Feb 24, 2026.

QS is expected to report earnings on Feb 18, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (-4.45% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QS($7.49B) has a higher market cap than DAN($2.34B). QS YTD gains are higher at: 140.077 vs. DAN (77.602). DAN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 801M vs. QS (-369.67M). QS has more cash in the bank: 1B vs. DAN (419M). QS has less debt than DAN: QS (73M) vs DAN (3.4B). DAN has higher revenues than QS: DAN (9.96B) vs QS (0).
DANQSDAN / QS
Capitalization2.34B7.49B31%
EBITDA801M-369.67M-217%
Gain YTD77.602140.07755%
P/E Ratio45.57N/A-
Revenue9.96B0-
Total Cash419M1B42%
Total Debt3.4B73M4,659%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DAN: Fundamental Ratings
DAN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
75
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
28
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
74
SMR RATING
1..100
82
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
39
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
93
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DANQS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 28 days ago
85%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DAN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
QS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ECTMX16.92N/A
N/A
Eaton Vance Dividend Builder C
FMQSX15.26N/A
N/A
Franklin Mutual Quest R
FTZIX57.75N/A
N/A
FullerThaler Behavrl Uncnstd Eq
SOIAX8.19N/A
N/A
Spirit of America Real Estate Inc&Gr Ins
IGICX44.72-0.22
-0.49%
American Funds Intl Gr and Inc C

QS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QS has been loosely correlated with SLDP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QS jumps, then SLDP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QS
1D Price
Change %
QS100%
-3.93%
SLDP - QS
54%
Loosely correlated
-4.20%
AEVA - QS
52%
Loosely correlated
+3.46%
GGR - QS
36%
Loosely correlated
-3.15%
MBLY - QS
36%
Loosely correlated
-3.85%
LIDR - QS
36%
Loosely correlated
-8.84%
More