MBLY
Price
$5.78Alerts
Change
+$0.15 (+2.66%)
Updated
Nov 11 closing price
Capitalization
4.87B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
QS
Price
$4.21Alerts
Change
-$0.24 (-5.39%)
Updated
Nov 11 closing price
Capitalization
2.63B
98 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MBLY vs QS

MBLY vs QS Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MBLY vs. QS commentary
Nov 12, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MBLY is a Hold and QS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
A.I.Advisor
a Summary for MBLY with price predictions
Nov 10, 2026

MBLY sees MACD Histogram just turned negative

MBLY saw its Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) turn negative on October 29, 2026. This is a bearish signal that suggests the stock could decline going forward. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 34 instances where the indicator turned negative. In 30 of the 34 cases the stock moved lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of a downward move at 88%.

Price Prediction Chart

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bearish Trend Analysis

The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on October 16, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on MBLY as a result. In 59 of 69 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 86%.

Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where MBLY declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 81%.

The Aroon Indicator for MBLY entered a downward trend on November 09, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.

Bullish Trend Analysis

The RSI Indicator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where MBLY's RSI Indicator exited the oversold zone, 23 of 30 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 77%.

The Stochastic Oscillator suggests the stock price trend may be in a reversal from a downward trend to an upward trend. 37 of 47 cases where MBLY's Stochastic Oscillator exited the oversold zone resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 79%.

Following a +14.23% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where MBLY advanced for three days, in 163 of 216 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 75%.

MBLY may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.

Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)

The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 13 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to outstanding earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.

The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 26 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly undervalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (0.593) is normal, around the industry mean (0.781). P/E Ratio (-1.153) is within average values for comparable stocks, (39.881). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.236) is also within normal values, averaging (1.494). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.043) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (3.164) is also within normal values, averaging (49.456).

The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 50 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.

The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 83 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly worse than average price growth. MBLY’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.

The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 97 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.

The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. MBLY’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 90, placing this stock worse than average.

A.I.Advisor
a Summary for QS with price predictions
Nov 10, 2026

QS in +11.19% Uptrend, growing for three consecutive days on November 09, 2026

Moving higher for three straight days is viewed as a bullish sign. Keep an eye on this stock for future growth. Considering data from situations where QS advanced for three days, in 192 of 236 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 81%.

Price Prediction Chart

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bullish Trend Analysis

The RSI Oscillator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where QS's RSI Indicator exited the oversold zone, 18 of 30 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 60%.

The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on November 06, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on QS as a result. In 76 of 94 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 81%.

The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for QS just turned positive on October 22, 2026. Looking at past instances where QS's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 33 of 42 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 79%.

Bearish Trend Analysis

The Stochastic Oscillator entered the overbought zone. Expect a price pull-back in the foreseeable future.

Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where QS declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 89%.

QS broke above its upper Bollinger Band on November 09, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.

The Aroon Indicator for QS entered a downward trend on October 26, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.

Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)

The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 15 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to outstanding earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.

The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 30 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly undervalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (2.512) is normal, around the industry mean (0.781). P/E Ratio (-6.388) is within average values for comparable stocks, (39.881). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.000) is also within normal values, averaging (1.494). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.043) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (0.000) is also within normal values, averaging (49.456).

The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 79 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly worse than average price growth. QS’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.

The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 97 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.

The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. QS’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 90, placing this stock worse than average.

FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MBLY vs QS: Fundamental Ratings
MBLY
QS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6114
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
26
Undervalued
30
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9797
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8379
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1315
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MBLY's Valuation (26) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as QS (30) in the null industry. This means that MBLY’s stock grew similarly to QS’s over the last 12 months.

MBLY's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as QS (100) in the null industry. This means that MBLY’s stock grew similarly to QS’s over the last 12 months.

MBLY's SMR Rating (97) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as QS (97) in the null industry. This means that MBLY’s stock grew similarly to QS’s over the last 12 months.

QS's Price Growth Rating (79) in the null industry is in the same range as MBLY (83) in the Auto Parts OEM industry. This means that QS’s stock grew similarly to MBLY’s over the last 12 months.

MBLY's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as QS (15) in the null industry. This means that MBLY’s stock grew similarly to QS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MBLYQS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 12, 2026
Stock price -- (MBLY: $5.63 vs. QS: $4.45)
Brand notoriety: MBLY and QS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MBLY: 83% vs. QS: 129%
Market capitalization -- MBLY: $4.87B vs. QS: $2.63B
MBLY [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $4.87B. QS’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $2.63B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $1.93K to $72.72B. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $4.82B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MBLY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while QS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MBLY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • QS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both MBLY and QS are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MBLY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MBLY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • QS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both MBLY and QS are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

MBLY (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а +0.72% price change this week, while QS (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was +8.01% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was -3.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was -18.81%.

Reported Earning Dates

QS is expected to report earnings on Feb 17, 2027.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (-3.18% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement

MBLY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MBLY has been loosely correlated with AUR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MBLY jumps, then AUR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MBLY
1D Price
Change %
MBLY100%
-3.92%
AUR - MBLY
44%
Loosely correlated
-2.15%
QS - MBLY
43%
Loosely correlated
-2.63%
HSAI - MBLY
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.63%
BWA - MBLY
39%
Loosely correlated
-1.92%
DCH - MBLY
35%
Loosely correlated
-3.26%
More

QS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QS has been closely correlated with SLDP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QS jumps, then SLDP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QS
1D Price
Change %
QS100%
-2.63%
SLDP - QS
70%
Closely correlated
-2.07%
AUR - QS
57%
Loosely correlated
-2.15%
SES - QS
53%
Loosely correlated
-2.56%
AEVA - QS
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.24%
MBLY - QS
44%
Loosely correlated
-3.92%
More
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SDTY39.01-0.07
-0.17%
YieldMax S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (SDTY)
GJUN41.68-0.11
-0.26%
FT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - June (GJUN)
VCRM74.43-0.26
-0.35%
Vanguard Core Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (VCRM)
STXG54.43-0.31
-0.57%
Strive 1000 Growth ETF (STXG)
DESK38.87-0.95
-2.38%
VanEck Office and Commercial REIT ETF (DESK)