MBLY
Price
$8.92
Change
+$0.02 (+0.22%)
Updated
Aug 14 closing price
Capitalization
7.58B
67 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
QS
Price
$6.19
Change
+$0.03 (+0.49%)
Updated
Aug 14 closing price
Capitalization
3.81B
73 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MBLY vs QS

MBLY vs QS Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MBLY vs. QS commentary
Aug 16, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MBLY is a Buy and QS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 16, 2026
Stock price -- (MBLY: $8.92 vs. QS: $6.19)
Brand notoriety: MBLY and QS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MBLY: 30% vs. QS: 58%
Market capitalization -- MBLY: $7.58B vs. QS: $3.81B
MBLY [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $7.58B. QS’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $3.81B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $73.66B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $5.37B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MBLY’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileQS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MBLY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • QS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both MBLY and QS are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MBLY’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MBLY’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • QS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MBLY is a better buy in the short-term than QS.

Price Growth

MBLY (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а +2.18% price change this week, while QS (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was +1.81% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was +0.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.47%.

Reported Earning Dates

MBLY is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.

QS is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (+0.09% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MBLY($7.58B) has a higher market cap than QS($3.81B). MBLY YTD gains are higher at: -14.559 vs. QS (-40.595). MBLY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 141M vs. QS (-336.7M). MBLY has more cash in the bank: 1.44B vs. QS (859M). MBLY has higher revenues than QS: MBLY (2.02B) vs QS (0).
MBLYQSMBLY / QS
Capitalization7.58B3.81B199%
EBITDA141M-336.7M-42%
Gain YTD-14.559-40.59536%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue2.02B0-
Total Cash1.44B859M168%
Total DebtN/A67.1M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MBLY vs QS: Fundamental Ratings
MBLY
QS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1711
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
34
Fair valued
46
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9898
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7476
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MBLY's Valuation (34) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as QS (46) in the null industry. This means that MBLY’s stock grew similarly to QS’s over the last 12 months.

MBLY's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as QS (100) in the null industry. This means that MBLY’s stock grew similarly to QS’s over the last 12 months.

MBLY's SMR Rating (98) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as QS (98) in the null industry. This means that MBLY’s stock grew similarly to QS’s over the last 12 months.

MBLY's Price Growth Rating (74) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as QS (76) in the null industry. This means that MBLY’s stock grew similarly to QS’s over the last 12 months.

MBLY's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as QS (100) in the null industry. This means that MBLY’s stock grew similarly to QS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MBLYQS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MBLY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
QS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
KBSX0.970.10
+11.76%
FST Corp
BLUW10.36N/A
N/A
Blue Water Acquisition Corp III
EGHAU10.66N/A
N/A
EGH Acquisition Corp.
LAD377.55-1.11
-0.29%
Lithia Motors
DXC10.79-0.41
-3.66%
DXC Technology Company

MBLY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MBLY has been loosely correlated with AUR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MBLY jumps, then AUR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MBLY
1D Price
Change %
MBLY100%
+0.22%
AUR - MBLY
44%
Loosely correlated
+2.19%
HSAI - MBLY
43%
Loosely correlated
-5.60%
QS - MBLY
38%
Loosely correlated
+0.49%
LEA - MBLY
38%
Loosely correlated
+1.88%
VC - MBLY
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.91%
More