Advertisement
MBLY vs QS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MBLY is a Hold and QS is a Hold.
MBLY's RSI Oscillator recovers from oversold territory
The RSI Indicator for MBLY moved out of oversold territory on October 13, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is shifting from a downward trend to an upward trend. Traders may want to buy the stock or call options. The A.I.dvisor looked at 29 similar instances when the indicator left oversold territory. In 26 of the 29 cases the stock moved higher. This puts the odds of a move higher at 90%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The Stochastic Oscillator suggests the stock price trend may be in a reversal from a downward trend to an upward trend. 35 of 44 cases where MBLY's Stochastic Oscillator exited the oversold zone resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 80%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for MBLY just turned positive on October 15, 2026. Looking at past instances where MBLY's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 25 of 33 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 76%.
Following a +5.84% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where MBLY advanced for three days, in 163 of 214 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 76%.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on October 16, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on MBLY as a result. In 57 of 69 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 83%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where MBLY declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 80%.
The Aroon Indicator for MBLY entered a downward trend on October 22, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 18 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to outstanding earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 28 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly undervalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (0.720) is normal, around the industry mean (0.879). P/E Ratio (-1.398) is within average values for comparable stocks, (39.808). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.236) is also within normal values, averaging (1.471). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.040) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (3.164) is also within normal values, averaging (49.084).
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 77 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly worse than average price growth. MBLY’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 97 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. MBLY’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 89, placing this stock worse than average.
QS in upward trend: price expected to rise as it breaks its lower Bollinger Band on October 12, 2026
QS may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options. In 31 of 36 cases where QS's price broke its lower Bollinger Band, its price rose further in the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 86%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The RSI Indicator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where QS's RSI Indicator exited the oversold zone, 24 of 29 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 83%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for QS just turned positive on October 22, 2026. Looking at past instances where QS's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 31 of 44 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 70%.
Following a +1.75% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where QS advanced for three days, in 197 of 238 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 83%.
Bearish Trend Analysis
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where QS declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 88%.
The Aroon Indicator for QS entered a downward trend on October 22, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 16 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to outstanding earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 31 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly undervalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (2.436) is normal, around the industry mean (0.879). P/E Ratio (-6.194) is within average values for comparable stocks, (39.808). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.000) is also within normal values, averaging (1.471). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.040) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (0.000) is also within normal values, averaging (49.084).
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 50 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 86 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly worse than average price growth. QS’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 97 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. QS’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 89, placing this stock worse than average.
MBLY | QS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 9 | 23 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 28 Undervalued | 31 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 97 | 97 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 77 | 86 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 18 | 16 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 55 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MBLY's Valuation (28) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as QS (31) in the null industry. This means that MBLY’s stock grew similarly to QS’s over the last 12 months.
MBLY's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as QS (100) in the null industry. This means that MBLY’s stock grew similarly to QS’s over the last 12 months.
MBLY's SMR Rating (97) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as QS (97) in the null industry. This means that MBLY’s stock grew similarly to QS’s over the last 12 months.
MBLY's Price Growth Rating (77) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as QS (86) in the null industry. This means that MBLY’s stock grew similarly to QS’s over the last 12 months.
QS's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the null industry is in the same range as MBLY (18) in the Auto Parts OEM industry. This means that QS’s stock grew similarly to MBLY’s over the last 12 months.
| MBLY | QS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | N/A |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 70% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 89% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 76% | 17 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 4 days ago 88% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 90% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MBLY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while QS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- MBLY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- QS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MBLY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- MBLY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
- QS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
Price Growth
MBLY (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а -1.82% price change this week, while QS (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was -1.89% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was -4.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -10.82%, and the average quarterly price growth was -18.64%.
Reported Earning Dates
MBLY is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.
QS is expected to report earnings on Feb 17, 2027.
Industries' Descriptions
@Auto Parts: OEM (-4.24% weekly)OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.
Advertisement
MBLY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MBLY has been loosely correlated with QS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MBLY jumps, then QS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MBLY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MBLY | 100% | -1.00% | ||
| QS - MBLY | 43% Loosely correlated | +4.27% | ||
| AUR - MBLY | 43% Loosely correlated | -2.99% | ||
| HSAI - MBLY | 41% Loosely correlated | -7.96% | ||
| VC - MBLY | 36% Loosely correlated | -3.69% | ||
| DCH - MBLY | 35% Loosely correlated | -3.50% | ||
More | ||||
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| NFLU | 13.35 | 0.72 | +5.70% |
| T-Rex 2X Long NFLX Daily Target ETF (NFLU) | |||
| TCAL | 23.15 | 0.15 | +0.66% |
| T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Premium Income ETF | |||
| MJ | 22.36 | -0.28 | -1.24% |
| Amplify Alternative Harvest ETF (MJ) | |||
| IYM | 179.80 | -3.48 | -1.90% |
| iShares U.S. Basic Materials ETF (IYM) | |||
| CBOT | 22.57 | -0.44 | -1.90% |
| Corgi Robots & Humanoids ETF (CBOT) | |||