DDL
Price
$2.57
Change
+$0.15 (+6.20%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
561.95M
30 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
HCWC
Price
$0.18
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
4.76M
30 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

DDL vs HCWC

DDL vs HCWC Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DDL vs. HCWC commentary
Aug 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DDL is a Buy and HCWC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 03, 2026
Stock price -- (DDL: $2.57 vs. HCWC: $0.18)
Brand notoriety: DDL and HCWC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food Retail industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DDL: 112% vs. HCWC: 243%
Market capitalization -- DDL: $561.95M vs. HCWC: $4.76M
DDL [@Food Retail] is valued at $561.95M. HCWC’s [@Food Retail] market capitalization is $4.76M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food Retail] industry ranges from $51.3B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food Retail] industry is $4.06B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DDL’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileHCWC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • DDL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • HCWC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, DDL is a better buy in the long-term than HCWC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DDL’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HCWC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DDL’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • HCWC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both DDL and HCWC are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

DDL (@Food Retail) experienced а +6.20% price change this week, while HCWC (@Food Retail) price change was -1.38% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food Retail industry was +2.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.78%.

Reported Earning Dates

DDL is expected to report earnings on Sep 02, 2026.

HCWC is expected to report earnings on Sep 02, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food Retail (+2.52% weekly)

The food retail industry includes companies that sell food, beverage and household products. Items sold include grocery, gourmet food, fresh produce, and frozen food. Kroger Co., George Weston Ltd., Grocery Outlet Holding Corp., and Sprouts Farmers Markets, Inc. are examples of major food retailers. While e-commerce companies like Amazon have increasingly been ramping-up offerings in the food retail space, several traditional players have also been expanding their online presence to stand their ground against rising competition.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DDL($562M) has a higher market cap than HCWC($4.76M). DDL YTD gains are higher at: 3.213 vs. HCWC (-28.685). DDL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 210M vs. HCWC (-547.95K). DDL has more cash in the bank: 371M vs. HCWC (2.35M). DDL has less debt than HCWC: DDL (125K) vs HCWC (16.4M). DDL has higher revenues than HCWC: DDL (24.5B) vs HCWC (76.2M).
DDLHCWCDDL / HCWC
Capitalization562M4.76M11,807%
EBITDA210M-547.95K-38,325%
Gain YTD3.213-28.685-11%
P/E Ratio22.73N/A-
Revenue24.5B76.2M32,152%
Total Cash371M2.35M15,787%
Total Debt125K16.4M1%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DDLHCWC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DDL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
HCWC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AMFEX21.500.16
+0.75%
AAMA Equity
CGIOX55.230.29
+0.53%
Calamos Growth and Income R6
VSVIX40.70N/A
N/A
Victory Integrity Small-Cap Value Y
JRAIX90.68N/A
N/A
Janus Henderson Research I
PZISX16.17-0.03
-0.19%
Pzena Small Cap Value Institutional

DDL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DDL and HCWC have been poorly correlated (+15% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DDL and HCWC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DDL
1D Price
Change %
DDL100%
+6.20%
HCWC - DDL
15%
Poorly correlated
+2.23%
DNUT - DDL
12%
Poorly correlated
-0.93%
MSS - DDL
9%
Poorly correlated
-2.88%
IMKTA - DDL
9%
Poorly correlated
+0.35%
WMK - DDL
8%
Poorly correlated
-0.81%
More

HCWC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HCWC has been loosely correlated with ATPC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HCWC jumps, then ATPC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HCWC
1D Price
Change %
HCWC100%
+2.23%
ATPC - HCWC
48%
Loosely correlated
-1.70%
FAMI - HCWC
29%
Poorly correlated
+7.78%
DAR - HCWC
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.59%
JVA - HCWC
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.74%
STKH - HCWC
18%
Poorly correlated
-15.19%
More