Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DDVRX vs FFFMX
DDVRX vs FFFMX Comparison
Open Charts DDVRX vs FFFMX
DDVRX vs FFFMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFFMX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. DDVRX (1.75B). FFFMX pays higher dividends than DDVRX: FFFMX (1.70) vs DDVRX (0.85). DDVRX was incepted earlier than FFFMX: DDVRX (21 years) vs FFFMX (6 years). DDVRX (1.20) is less costly to investors than FFFMX (0.32). DDVRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. FFFMX (30.00). DDVRX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFFMX: DDVRX (0) vs FFFMX (250). FFFMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.99 vs. DDVRX (-6.29). FFFMX return over 5 years is better than : 40.88 vs. DDVRX (-44.91).
| DDVRX | FFFMX | DDVRX / FFFMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.32 | 375% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.32 | 375% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.378 | 6.825 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.75B | 117B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.85 | 1.70 | 50% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.29 | 10.99 | -57% |
| Returns for 3 years | -29.43 | 37.62 | -78% |
| Returns for 5 years | -44.91 | 40.88 | -110% |
| Returns for 10 years | -28.06 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| RSEDX | 20.55 | N/A | N/A |
| Columbia Intrinsic Value Institutional 2 | |||
| LVOPX | 19.45 | N/A | N/A |
| Lord Abbett Value Opportunities P | |||
| IMIDX | 22.69 | N/A | N/A |
| Congress Mid Cap Growth Institutional | |||
| TNXAX | 10.82 | N/A | N/A |
| 1290 Loomis Sayles Multi-Asset Income A | |||
| CCOYX | 301.26 | N/A | N/A |
| Columbia Seligman Tech & Info Inst3 | |||