DEA | SLG | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 38 | 12 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 38 Fair valued | 84 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 90 | 92 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 54 | 48 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | 65 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
DEA's Valuation (38) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SLG (84). This means that DEA’s stock grew somewhat faster than SLG’s over the last 12 months.
DEA's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as SLG (100). This means that DEA’s stock grew similarly to SLG’s over the last 12 months.
DEA's SMR Rating (90) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as SLG (92). This means that DEA’s stock grew similarly to SLG’s over the last 12 months.
SLG's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as DEA (54). This means that SLG’s stock grew similarly to DEA’s over the last 12 months.
DEA's P/E Growth Rating (48) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as SLG (65). This means that DEA’s stock grew similarly to SLG’s over the last 12 months.
| DEA | SLG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 48% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 77% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 75% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 71% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 60% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 81% |
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
DEA’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while SLG’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
DEA’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SLG’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
DEA is expected to report earnings on Oct 26, 2026.
SLG is expected to report earnings on Oct 21, 2026.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DEA has been loosely correlated with CDP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DEA jumps, then CDP could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SLG has been closely correlated with VNO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SLG jumps, then VNO could also see price increases.