DECK
Price
$118.66
Change
+$0.16 (+0.14%)
Updated
Sep 15 closing price
Capitalization
17.6B
37 days until earnings call
ONON
Price
$42.67
Change
-$0.22 (-0.51%)
Updated
Sep 15, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
13.93B
Interact to see
Advertisement

DECK vs ONON

Header iconDECK vs ONON Comparison
Open Charts DECK vs ONONBanner chart's image
Deckers Outdoor
Price$118.66
Change+$0.16 (+0.14%)
Volume$2.64M
Capitalization17.6B
On Holding AG
Price$42.67
Change-$0.22 (-0.51%)
Volume$29.13K
Capitalization13.93B
DECK vs ONON Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
DECK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ONON
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DECK vs. ONON commentary
Sep 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DECK is a StrongBuy and ONON is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 16, 2025
Stock price -- (DECK: $118.66 vs. ONON: $42.67)
Brand notoriety: DECK and ONON are both not notable
Both companies represent the Wholesale Distributors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DECK: 72% vs. ONON: 78%
Market capitalization -- DECK: $17.6B vs. ONON: $13.93B
DECK [@Wholesale Distributors] is valued at $17.6B. ONON’s [@Wholesale Distributors] market capitalization is $13.93B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Wholesale Distributors] industry ranges from $107.86B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Wholesale Distributors] industry is $8.46B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DECK’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileONON’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • DECK’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • ONON’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, DECK is a better buy in the long-term than ONON.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DECK’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ONON’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DECK’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • ONON’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, DECK is a better buy in the short-term than ONON.

Price Growth

DECK (@Wholesale Distributors) experienced а +1.27% price change this week, while ONON (@Wholesale Distributors) price change was -5.60% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Wholesale Distributors industry was +0.72%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.37%, and the average quarterly price growth was +45.43%.

Reported Earning Dates

DECK is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Wholesale Distributors (+0.72% weekly)

Companies in this industry handle the wholesale shipments for the manufacturer of a product. They have warehouses and distribution centers, and they ship products directly to the retailer. Digitization, increasing competition, emerging customer demand, and product innovation are some of shifts that the industry has been facing in recent times – something that is potentially creating needs/opportunities for business model revisions or transformations. Data, analytics, and technology are becoming increasingly important for whole distributors in anticipating and analyzing consumer needs, and therefore planning their business strategies accordingly. Fastenal Company, W.W. Grainger, Inc., Genuine Parts Company and Pool Corporation are some of the largest names in the business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DECK($17.6B) has a higher market cap than ONON($13.9B). ONON has higher P/E ratio than DECK: ONON (81.09) vs DECK (18.23). ONON YTD gains are higher at: -21.691 vs. DECK (-41.573). DECK has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.35B vs. ONON (273M). DECK has more cash in the bank: 1.72B vs. ONON (898M). DECK has less debt than ONON: DECK (312M) vs ONON (498M). DECK has higher revenues than ONON: DECK (5.13B) vs ONON (2.72B).
DECKONONDECK / ONON
Capitalization17.6B13.9B127%
EBITDA1.35B273M495%
Gain YTD-41.573-21.691192%
P/E Ratio18.2381.0922%
Revenue5.13B2.72B189%
Total Cash1.72B898M192%
Total Debt312M498M63%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DECK: Fundamental Ratings
DECK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
38
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
80
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
58
SMR RATING
1..100
21
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
51
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
89
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DECKONON
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DECK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ONON
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EWA27.570.33
+1.21%
iShares MSCI Australia ETF
BYM11.070.11
+0.96%
BLACKROCK Municipal Income QUALITY TRUST
UJB79.160.40
+0.51%
ProShares Ultra High Yield
JHCB21.920.03
+0.12%
JHancock Corporate Bond ETF
EVLU29.94N/A
N/A
iShares MSCI Emerging Mkts Val Fac ETF

ONON and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ONON has been loosely correlated with RL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ONON jumps, then RL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ONON
1D Price
Change %
ONON100%
-0.95%
RL - ONON
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.38%
DECK - ONON
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.53%
BIRK - ONON
56%
Loosely correlated
-2.41%
VFC - ONON
53%
Loosely correlated
-4.01%
HBI - ONON
51%
Loosely correlated
-2.35%
More