Intraday BUY SELL Signals
74 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DEHP vs UMC
DEHP vs UMC Comparison
Open Charts DEHP vs UMC
DEHP vs UMC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DEHP vs. UMC commentary
Aug 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DEHP is a Buy and UMC is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
UMC: Fundamental Ratings
UMC | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 8 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 33 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 41 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 45 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 37 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 16 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| DEHP | UMC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 59% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 73% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 71% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 69% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 68% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 63% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 62% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 75% | 9 days ago 62% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 68% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 54% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
DEHP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DEHP has been loosely correlated with IQ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DEHP jumps, then IQ could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DEHP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DEHP | 100% | -0.22% | ||
| IQ - DEHP | 58% Loosely correlated | -0.74% | ||
| ING - DEHP | 55% Loosely correlated | +0.28% | ||
| CLS - DEHP | 55% Loosely correlated | -3.62% | ||
| VALE - DEHP | 53% Loosely correlated | -1.23% | ||
| UMC - DEHP | 52% Loosely correlated | -1.19% | ||
More | ||||
UMC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UMC has been loosely correlated with GFS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UMC jumps, then GFS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To UMC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UMC | 100% | -1.19% | ||
| GFS - UMC | 58% Loosely correlated | +3.59% | ||
| LRCX - UMC | 58% Loosely correlated | -1.38% | ||
| KLAC - UMC | 57% Loosely correlated | -2.70% | ||
| ASX - UMC | 56% Loosely correlated | -0.25% | ||
| AMAT - UMC | 55% Loosely correlated | -5.12% | ||
More | ||||