GFS
Price
$68.97
Change
-$0.74 (-1.06%)
Updated
Jul 10 closing price
Capitalization
37.84B
25 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
UMC
Price
$24.33
Change
-$0.53 (-2.13%)
Updated
Jul 10, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
61.2B
18 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

GFS vs UMC

GFS vs UMC Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GFS vs. UMC commentary
Jul 11, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFS is a Hold and UMC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 11, 2026
Stock price -- (GFS: $68.97 vs. UMC: $24.34)
Brand notoriety: GFS and UMC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Semiconductors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GFS: 31% vs. UMC: 37%
Market capitalization -- GFS: $37.84B vs. UMC: $61.2B
GFS [@Semiconductors] is valued at $37.84B. UMC’s [@Semiconductors] market capitalization is $61.2B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Semiconductors] industry ranges from $5.11T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Semiconductors] industry is $206.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GFS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileUMC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • GFS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • UMC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, UMC is a better buy in the long-term than GFS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GFS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UMC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GFS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • UMC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GFS is a better buy in the short-term than UMC.

Price Growth

GFS (@Semiconductors) experienced а -1.25% price change this week, while UMC (@Semiconductors) price change was +0.93% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was +1.42%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.74%, and the average quarterly price growth was +62.76%.

Reported Earning Dates

GFS is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.

UMC is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Semiconductors (+1.42% weekly)

The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
UMC($61.2B) has a higher market cap than GFS($37.8B). GFS has higher P/E ratio than UMC: GFS (49.62) vs UMC (39.52). UMC YTD gains are higher at: 215.120 vs. GFS (97.793). UMC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 118B vs. GFS (2.4B). UMC has higher revenues than GFS: UMC (241B) vs GFS (6.77B).
GFSUMCGFS / UMC
Capitalization37.8B61.2B62%
EBITDA2.4B118B2%
Gain YTD97.793215.12045%
P/E Ratio49.6239.52126%
Revenue6.77B241B3%
Total Cash1.81BN/A-
Total Debt1.72BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
UMC: Fundamental Ratings
UMC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
72
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
53
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6
SMR RATING
1..100
65
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
34
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GFSUMC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GFS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
UMC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JCAP18.850.33
+1.78%
Jefferson Capital Inc
LGPS0.79N/A
N/A
LogProstyle Inc
CAN0.31N/A
-0.29%
Canaan
SPG218.77-0.94
-0.43%
Simon Property Group
CELC107.58-5.93
-5.22%
Celcuity

GFS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GFS has been closely correlated with KLIC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GFS jumps, then KLIC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GFS
1D Price
Change %
GFS100%
-1.06%
KLIC - GFS
72%
Closely correlated
+1.81%
FORM - GFS
69%
Closely correlated
-1.61%
ENTG - GFS
67%
Closely correlated
-0.51%
LRCX - GFS
66%
Loosely correlated
-0.80%
DIOD - GFS
65%
Loosely correlated
+1.67%
More

UMC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UMC has been loosely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UMC jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UMC
1D Price
Change %
UMC100%
-2.09%
LRCX - UMC
58%
Loosely correlated
-0.80%
KLAC - UMC
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.88%
AMAT - UMC
55%
Loosely correlated
+2.35%
GFS - UMC
51%
Loosely correlated
-1.06%
ASX - UMC
51%
Loosely correlated
-1.36%
More