| DFAS | QVMS | DFAS / QVMS | |
| Gain YTD | 15.744 | 19.271 | 82% |
| Net Assets | 14.9B | 248M | 6,008% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.26 | 0.15 | 173% |
| Turnover | 6.00 | 35.00 | 17% |
| Yield | 0.92 | 1.13 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 5 years | - |
| DFAS | QVMS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 80% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 82% | 8 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 82% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| ASMF | 26.12 | 0.29 | +1.14% |
| Virtus AlphaSimplex Managed Futures ETF | |||
| SPXU | 37.77 | 0.35 | +0.94% |
| ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500 | |||
| CPSY | 25.67 | N/A | N/A |
| Calamos S&P 500 Str Alt Prt ETF-Jan | |||
| PTLC | 58.03 | -0.25 | -0.43% |
| Pacer Trendpilot™ US Large Cap ETF | |||
| NMS | 12.00 | -0.15 | -1.23% |
| Nuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DFAS has been closely correlated with UFPI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DFAS jumps, then UFPI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DFAS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DFAS | 100% | +0.12% | ||
| UFPI - DFAS | 82% Closely correlated | -1.33% | ||
| IBP - DFAS | 70% Closely correlated | -2.90% | ||
| AIT - DFAS | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.03% | ||
| CMC - DFAS | 62% Loosely correlated | +1.29% | ||
| ENSG - DFAS | 48% Loosely correlated | +2.04% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QVMS has been closely correlated with BCC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QVMS jumps, then BCC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QVMS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QVMS | 100% | +0.19% | ||
| BCC - QVMS | 70% Closely correlated | -2.84% | ||
| IBP - QVMS | 69% Closely correlated | -2.90% | ||
| MTH - QVMS | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.86% | ||
| MLI - QVMS | 65% Loosely correlated | +1.54% | ||
| ATI - QVMS | 60% Loosely correlated | +1.37% | ||
More | ||||