| DFAS | QVMS | DFAS / QVMS | |
| Gain YTD | 19.437 | 21.219 | 92% |
| Net Assets | 15.7B | 252M | 6,230% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.26 | 0.15 | 173% |
| Turnover | 6.00 | 35.00 | 17% |
| Yield | 0.98 | 1.15 | 85% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 5 years | - |
| DFAS | QVMS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 77% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 68% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 71% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 83% | 13 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 21 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 69% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 72% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| NBIZ | 7.00 | 0.48 | +7.36% |
| Tradr 2X Short Nbis Daily ETF | |||
| SMCF | 40.03 | 0.17 | +0.43% |
| Themes US Small Cp CA Flw Champ ETF | |||
| LRGF | 78.15 | 0.09 | +0.12% |
| iShares U.S. Equity Factor ETF | |||
| UDIV | 61.53 | 0.02 | +0.04% |
| Franklin US Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF | |||
| GMAY | 43.77 | -0.02 | -0.06% |
| FT Vest U.S. Eq Mod Buffr ETF - May | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DFAS has been closely correlated with UFPI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DFAS jumps, then UFPI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DFAS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DFAS | 100% | +0.24% | ||
| UFPI - DFAS | 82% Closely correlated | -2.69% | ||
| IBP - DFAS | 70% Closely correlated | -0.40% | ||
| AIT - DFAS | 65% Loosely correlated | +2.03% | ||
| CMC - DFAS | 62% Loosely correlated | +2.33% | ||
| ENSG - DFAS | 48% Loosely correlated | +0.90% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QVMS has been closely correlated with BCC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QVMS jumps, then BCC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QVMS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QVMS | 100% | -0.44% | ||
| BCC - QVMS | 70% Closely correlated | -1.36% | ||
| IBP - QVMS | 69% Closely correlated | -0.40% | ||
| MTH - QVMS | 65% Loosely correlated | -1.65% | ||
| MLI - QVMS | 65% Loosely correlated | +4.18% | ||
| ATI - QVMS | 60% Loosely correlated | -1.10% | ||
More | ||||