Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DFFVX vs HWSCX
DFFVX vs HWSCX Comparison
Open Charts DFFVX vs HWSCX
DFFVX vs HWSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DFFVX vs. HWSCX commentary
Aug 06, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DFFVX is a Buy and HWSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DFFVX has more cash in the bank: 17B vs. HWSCX (870M). DFFVX pays higher dividends than HWSCX: DFFVX (1.49) vs HWSCX (0.07). DFFVX was incepted earlier than HWSCX: DFFVX (26 years) vs HWSCX (25 years). HWSCX (1.96) is less costly to investors than DFFVX (0.30). HWSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. DFFVX (10.00). DFFVX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWSCX: DFFVX (0) vs HWSCX (2500). DFFVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 36.93 vs. HWSCX (30.44). DFFVX return over 5 years is better than : 60.94 vs. HWSCX (33.01).
| DFFVX | HWSCX | DFFVX / HWSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 1.96 | 15% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 1.96 | 15% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.114 | 25.931 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 17B | 870M | 1,954% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.49 | 0.07 | 2,186% |
| Returns for 1 year | 36.93 | 30.44 | 121% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.83 | 24.83 | 225% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.94 | 33.01 | 185% |
| Returns for 10 years | 125.94 | 64.88 | 194% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement