DFNL
Price
$52.53
Change
+$0.69 (+1.33%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Net Assets
486.3M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
XLF
Price
$58.56
Change
+$0.90 (+1.56%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Net Assets
54.49B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

DFNL vs XLF

DFNL vs XLF Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 22, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? Davis Select Financial ETF (DFNL) vs. Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF)

Key Takeaways

  • DFNL is an actively managed ETF concentrating on a small number of high-conviction financial companies, while XLF provides passive, rules-based exposure to a broad basket of financial sector stocks from the S&P 500.
  • DFNL holds approximately 31 securities with an expense ratio of 0.63 percent, compared with XLF’s roughly 75 holdings and significantly lower expense ratio of 0.08 percent.
  • Both ETFs target the U.S. financial services sector, including banks, insurance, capital markets, and consumer finance, but DFNL employs a benchmark-agnostic strategy focused on long-term capital growth.
  • XLF offers greater diversification within financials and higher liquidity, whereas DFNL’s concentrated portfolio introduces higher idiosyncratic risk alongside the potential for outperformance from manager selection.
  • Expense efficiency and broad market-cap exposure favor XLF for core sector allocation, while DFNL may appeal to investors seeking active management in financials.
  • Recent market cycles have highlighted differences in volatility and relative performance driven by interest-rate sensitivity and earnings momentum among large financial institutions.

Introduction

Investors seeking targeted exposure to the U.S. financial sector often compare the Davis Select Financial ETF (DFNL) and the Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF). These ETFs do not compete directly as identical products; instead, they represent alternative approaches to the same broad sector. DFNL employs active management with a concentrated, high-conviction portfolio, while XLF delivers passive replication of the financials component of the S&P 500 Index. The comparison helps investors evaluate trade-offs between active selection, cost, diversification, and liquidity within financial services.

Davis Select Financial ETF (DFNL) Overview

The Davis Select Financial ETF (DFNL) is an actively managed exchange-traded fund that seeks long-term growth of capital by investing at least 80 percent of its assets in companies principally engaged in the financial services sector. The fund typically holds between 15 and 35 securities selected using the Davis Investment Discipline, a benchmark-agnostic process emphasizing high-quality businesses. As of recent data, DFNL maintains approximately 31 holdings. Top positions often include Capital One Financial, U.S. Bancorp, Berkshire Hathaway, Fifth Third Bancorp, and PNC Financial Services Group. The strategy permits investments across market capitalizations and in select foreign issuers. DFNL carries an expense ratio of 0.63 percent and is structured as a non-diversified, actively managed ETF with annual rebalancing driven by fundamental analysis rather than index rules.

Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF) Overview

The Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF) is a passively managed ETF designed to track the Financial Select Sector Index, which represents the financials sector of the S&P 500. The fund invests substantially all assets in the index constituents, providing exposure to banks, insurance companies, capital markets firms, mortgage real estate investment trusts, and consumer finance companies. XLF typically holds around 75 securities and maintains an expense ratio of 0.08 percent. Top holdings generally feature Berkshire Hathaway, JPMorgan Chase, Visa, Mastercard, and Bank of America. The ETF follows a market-capitalization-weighted methodology with quarterly rebalancing aligned to the underlying index. XLF is non-diversified within the sector but offers broad representation of large-cap financial companies listed on major U.S. exchanges.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The U.S. financial sector encompasses banks, insurers, asset managers, and payment networks that benefit from economic growth, credit demand, and capital markets activity. Key macro drivers include interest-rate expectations from the Federal Reserve, regulatory developments affecting capital requirements, and corporate earnings tied to loan growth and fee income. Recent market cycles have featured sector rotation influenced by inflation trends and monetary policy shifts. Capital flows into financials have varied with merger-and-acquisition activity and digital transformation initiatives. Risks include credit-cycle downturns, regulatory tightening, and geopolitical events that affect global capital flows. Both ETFs remain positioned to capture these dynamics through their respective strategies.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent weeks and months, performance differences between the Davis Select Financial ETF (DFNL) and the Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF) have reflected their structural distinctions. DFNL’s concentrated holdings can produce greater dispersion relative to the broader sector during earnings seasons or when active picks diverge from index weights. XLF has delivered more stable tracking of large-cap financials, benefiting from its low-cost structure and high liquidity during periods of sector rotation. Volatility profiles differ, with DFNL exhibiting potentially higher idiosyncratic risk due to fewer holdings, while XLF provides smoother exposure aligned with S&P 500 financials. Relative positioning favors XLF for investors prioritizing cost efficiency and broad diversification, whereas DFNL may suit those seeking active outperformance potential in select financial names.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Investors comparing sector ETFs may find the tool useful for discovering additional ideas aligned with their objectives.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probability of favorability to the Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF). Its substantially lower expense ratio, broader diversification across approximately 75 holdings, and passive replication of the S&P 500 financials sector provide cost efficiency and reduced idiosyncratic risk. While the Davis Select Financial ETF (DFNL) offers active management and high-conviction selection that could outperform in specific cycles, the combination of lower costs and consistent sector exposure gives XLF a probabilistic edge for most investors seeking core financials allocation in the current environment.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
DFNL vs. XLF commentary
Sep 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DFNL is a Hold and XLF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XLF has more net assets: 54.5B vs. DFNL (486M). DFNL has a higher annual dividend yield than XLF: DFNL (8.693) vs XLF (7.847). DFNL was incepted earlier than XLF: DFNL (10 years) vs XLF (28 years). XLF (0.08) has a lower expense ratio than DFNL (0.61). XLF has a higher turnover DFNL (1.00) vs DFNL (1.00).
DFNLXLFDFNL / XLF
Gain YTD8.6937.847111%
Net Assets486M54.5B1%
Total Expense Ratio0.610.08763%
Turnover1.006.0017%
Yield1.281.4092%
Fund Existence10 years28 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DFNLXLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DFNL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
XLF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LMEAX22.43N/A
N/A
Franklin International Equity A
TILIX78.60N/A
N/A
Nuveen Large Cap Gr Idx R6
NQCCX4.81N/A
N/A
Nuveen Large Cap Value Opportunities C
ARGFX84.36N/A
N/A
Ariel Fund Investor
PUGCX18.77N/A
N/A
Putnam Focused International Equity C