Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DFSCX vs NAESX
DFSCX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts DFSCX vs NAESX
DFSCX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DFSCX vs. NAESX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DFSCX is a Hold and NAESX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 185B vs. DFSCX (7.67B). NAESX pays higher dividends than DFSCX: NAESX (1.09) vs DFSCX (0.86). DFSCX was incepted earlier than NAESX: DFSCX (45 years) vs NAESX (66 years). DFSCX (0.42) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). NAESX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.00 vs. DFSCX (7.00). DFSCX (0) and NAESX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. DFSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.96 vs. NAESX (13.09). DFSCX return over 5 years is better than : 41.12 vs. NAESX (32.77).
| DFSCX | NAESX | DFSCX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 0.17 | 241% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.42 | 0.17 | 247% |
| Fund Existence | 45 years | 66 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.363 | 12.982 | 165% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.67B | 185B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.86 | 1.09 | 79% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.96 | 13.09 | 175% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.47 | 49.57 | 128% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.12 | 32.77 | 125% |
| Returns for 10 years | 112.77 | 152.60 | 74% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers