Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DFSCX vs NAESX
DFSCX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts DFSCX vs NAESX
DFSCX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DFSCX vs. NAESX commentary
Jun 18, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DFSCX is a Hold and NAESX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 183B vs. DFSCX (7.75B). NAESX pays higher dividends than DFSCX: NAESX (1.08) vs DFSCX (0.83). DFSCX was incepted earlier than NAESX: DFSCX (45 years) vs NAESX (66 years). DFSCX (0.42) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). NAESX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.00 vs. DFSCX (7.00). DFSCX (0) and NAESX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. DFSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 37.75 vs. NAESX (29.13). DFSCX (38.35) and NAESX (37.66) have equivalent 5 years return.
| DFSCX | NAESX | DFSCX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 0.17 | 241% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.42 | 0.17 | 247% |
| Fund Existence | 45 years | 66 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.530 | 14.975 | 124% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.75B | 183B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.83 | 1.08 | 76% |
| Returns for 1 year | 37.75 | 29.13 | 130% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.74 | 51.95 | 113% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.35 | 37.66 | 102% |
| Returns for 10 years | 118.17 | 168.08 | 70% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement