Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DGIFX vs FCSDX
DGIFX vs FCSDX Comparison
Open Charts DGIFX vs FCSDX
DGIFX vs FCSDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DGIFX vs. FCSDX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DGIFX is a Hold and FCSDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCSDX has more cash in the bank: 5.8B vs. DGIFX (648M). FCSDX pays higher dividends than DGIFX: FCSDX (1.26) vs DGIFX (0.89). DGIFX was incepted earlier than FCSDX: DGIFX (15 years) vs FCSDX (23 years). FCSDX (1.67) is less costly to investors than DGIFX (0.78). FCSDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. DGIFX (19.00). FCSDX has a lower initial minimum investment than DGIFX: FCSDX (0) vs DGIFX (10000). FCSDX (13.64) and DGIFX (13.43) have marching annual gain over last year. FCSDX return over 5 years is better than : 18.07 vs. DGIFX (12.05).
| DGIFX | FCSDX | DGIFX / FCSDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 1.67 | 47% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 1.67 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.729 | 14.218 | 146% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 648M | 5.8B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.89 | 1.26 | 71% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.43 | 13.64 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.77 | 34.03 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.05 | 18.07 | 67% |
| Returns for 10 years | 77.32 | 49.91 | 155% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement