Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DGIFX vs FCSDX
DGIFX vs FCSDX Comparison
Open Charts DGIFX vs FCSDX
DGIFX vs FCSDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DGIFX vs. FCSDX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DGIFX is a Buy and FCSDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCSDX has more cash in the bank: 5.76B vs. DGIFX (647M). FCSDX pays higher dividends than DGIFX: FCSDX (1.41) vs DGIFX (0.88). DGIFX was incepted earlier than FCSDX: DGIFX (15 years) vs FCSDX (22 years). FCSDX (1.67) is less costly to investors than DGIFX (0.78). FCSDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. DGIFX (17.00). FCSDX has a lower initial minimum investment than DGIFX: FCSDX (0) vs DGIFX (10000). DGIFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.00 vs. FCSDX (15.89). FCSDX return over 5 years is better than : 18.20 vs. DGIFX (11.84).
| DGIFX | FCSDX | DGIFX / FCSDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 1.67 | 47% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 1.67 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.446 | 11.628 | 150% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 647M | 5.76B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.88 | 1.41 | 63% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.00 | 15.89 | 120% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.21 | 32.02 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.84 | 18.20 | 65% |
| Returns for 10 years | 83.29 | 52.16 | 160% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement