Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DGIFX vs FCSDX
DGIFX vs FCSDX Comparison
Open Charts DGIFX vs FCSDX
DGIFX vs FCSDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DGIFX vs. FCSDX commentary
Jul 07, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DGIFX is a Hold and FCSDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCSDX has more cash in the bank: 5.82B vs. DGIFX (627M). FCSDX pays higher dividends than DGIFX: FCSDX (1.39) vs DGIFX (0.88). DGIFX was incepted earlier than FCSDX: DGIFX (15 years) vs FCSDX (23 years). FCSDX (1.67) is less costly to investors than DGIFX (0.78). FCSDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. DGIFX (17.00). FCSDX has a lower initial minimum investment than DGIFX: FCSDX (0) vs DGIFX (10000). FCSDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.11 vs. DGIFX (10.63). FCSDX return over 5 years is better than : 18.88 vs. DGIFX (9.09).
| DGIFX | FCSDX | DGIFX / FCSDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 1.67 | 47% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 1.67 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.981 | 13.472 | 119% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 627M | 5.82B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.88 | 1.39 | 63% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.63 | 14.11 | 75% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.49 | 32.64 | 57% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.09 | 18.88 | 48% |
| Returns for 10 years | 80.61 | 50.86 | 158% |