Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DGIFX vs FSIDX
DGIFX vs FSIDX Comparison
Open Charts DGIFX vs FSIDX
DGIFX vs FSIDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DGIFX vs. FSIDX commentary
Jul 28, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DGIFX is a Hold and FSIDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSIDX has more cash in the bank: 5.82B vs. DGIFX (609M). FSIDX pays higher dividends than DGIFX: FSIDX (2.27) vs DGIFX (0.88). DGIFX was incepted earlier than FSIDX: DGIFX (15 years) vs FSIDX (23 years). DGIFX (0.78) is less costly to investors than FSIDX (0.67). FSIDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. DGIFX (17.00). FSIDX has a lower initial minimum investment than DGIFX: FSIDX (0) vs DGIFX (10000). FSIDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.22 vs. DGIFX (6.41). FSIDX return over 5 years is better than : 24.55 vs. DGIFX (4.81).
| DGIFX | FSIDX | DGIFX / FSIDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 0.67 | 116% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 0.67 | 116% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.633 | 14.189 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 609M | 5.82B | 10% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.88 | 2.27 | 39% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.41 | 14.22 | 45% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.70 | 33.15 | 26% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.81 | 24.55 | 20% |
| Returns for 10 years | 69.06 | 61.72 | 112% |