| DGT | SFGV | DGT / SFGV | |
| Gain YTD | 15.723 | 15.791 | 100% |
| Net Assets | 635M | 1.18B | 54% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.33 | 152% |
| Turnover | 9.00 | 46.00 | 20% |
| Yield | 2.43 | 2.29 | 106% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 3 years | - |
| DGT | SFGV | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 63% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 55% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 56% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 58% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 54% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 87% | 10 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 53% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 79% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DGT has been closely correlated with MT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DGT jumps, then MT could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that SFGV and JNJ have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SFGV and JNJ's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SFGV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SFGV | 100% | +0.75% | ||
| JNJ - SFGV | 9% Poorly correlated | -0.29% | ||
| MRK - SFGV | 8% Poorly correlated | -0.54% | ||
| AAPL - SFGV | -4% Poorly correlated | +1.75% | ||
| CSCO - SFGV | -7% Poorly correlated | +4.37% | ||
| XOM - SFGV | -27% Poorly correlated | +0.46% |