Advertisement
CVX vs SFGV
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CVX is a Hold and SFGV is a Hold.
CVX | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 81 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 43 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 9 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 63 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 46 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 39 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| CVX | SFGV | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 40% | 4 days ago 69% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 46% | 3 days ago 89% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 51% | 3 days ago 66% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 40% | 3 days ago 53% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 40% | 3 days ago 58% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 59% | 3 days ago 54% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 62% | 18 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 40% | 5 days ago 53% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 48% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 57% | 3 days ago 78% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CVX’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while .
- CVX’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CVX’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- CVX’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
CVX (@Integrated Oil) experienced а -2.13% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Integrated Oil industry was -1.93%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.97%.
Reported Earning Dates
CVX is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Integrated Oil (-1.93% weekly)Integrated oil companies are involved across nearly the entire oil value chain – from upstream operations like exploration and production, to downstream functions of refining and marketing. Exxon Mobil Corporation, Chevron Corporation and BP are major integrated oil companies. Their bottom lines’ response to crude oil prices could depend on the proportion of upstream vs. downstream businesses; for example, if a company has substantial downstream business, the adverse impact on their upstream business due to falling crude prices could be mitigated by benefits to its downstream business.
Advertisement
CVX and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CVX has been closely correlated with XOM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CVX jumps, then XOM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CVX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVX | 100% | -0.97% | ||
| XOM - CVX | 84% Closely correlated | +0.17% | ||
| CRGY - CVX | 72% Closely correlated | -1.49% | ||
| BP - CVX | 70% Closely correlated | -1.85% | ||
| EQNR - CVX | 69% Closely correlated | -0.54% | ||
| SHEL - CVX | 66% Loosely correlated | -1.34% | ||
More | ||||
SFGV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SFGV and JNJ have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SFGV and JNJ's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SFGV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SFGV | 100% | -0.64% | ||
| JNJ - SFGV | 10% Poorly correlated | -0.09% | ||
| MRK - SFGV | 8% Poorly correlated | -0.19% | ||
| AAPL - SFGV | -4% Poorly correlated | -0.26% | ||
| CSCO - SFGV | -8% Poorly correlated | -0.66% | ||
| CVX - SFGV | -25% Poorly correlated | -0.97% | ||
More | ||||