DIA
Price
$534.08
Change
-$2.85 (-0.53%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Net Assets
46.42B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
VFLO
Price
$55.29
Change
-$0.78 (-1.39%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Net Assets
11.27B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

DIA vs VFLO

DIA vs VFLO Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Sep 01, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust (DIA) vs. VictoryShares Free Cash Flow ETF (VFLO)

Key Takeaways

  • DIA provides exposure to 30 blue-chip U.S. companies via the price-weighted Dow Jones Industrial Average, while VFLO targets approximately 50 large-cap stocks selected for high free cash flow yields and growth characteristics.
  • DIA maintains a significantly lower expense ratio of 0.16% compared to VFLO’s net expense ratio of 0.39%, enhancing long-term cost efficiency for buy-and-hold investors.
  • Sector allocations differ markedly: DIA emphasizes financials, industrials, and information technology, whereas VFLO concentrates on information technology, energy, and healthcare.
  • DIA operates as a unit investment trust with fixed holdings tied to the index, offering high liquidity and established market presence; VFLO uses rules-based index methodology with quarterly rebalancing.
  • Both ETFs deliver U.S. large-cap equity exposure but serve distinct investor objectives—broad market representation versus free cash flow-focused selection—within the same large-cap equity category.
  • Structural differences in holdings count, weighting schemes, and expense structures create varying risk and return profiles suited to different market environments and investor preferences.

Introduction

Investors seeking U.S. large-cap equity exposure often evaluate established benchmarks against factor-driven strategies. The State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust (DIA) and the VictoryShares Free Cash Flow ETF (VFLO) represent two distinct approaches within this category. DIA delivers broad exposure to iconic blue-chip companies through a well-known market index, while VFLO applies a rules-based methodology emphasizing free cash flow generation and growth. These ETFs do not compete directly but offer complementary or alternative positioning for investors balancing market representation with quality-focused selection in evolving economic conditions.

State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust (DIA) Overview

The State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust (DIA) seeks to track the price and yield performance of the Dow Jones Industrial Average before expenses. It holds the 30 component stocks of the index, weighted by price. The fund maintains approximately 30 holdings and features top positions that can include Goldman Sachs, Caterpillar, Microsoft, Amgen, and UnitedHealth Group. Sector allocations typically emphasize financials, information technology, industrials, and healthcare. With an expense ratio of 0.16%, DIA operates as a passive unit investment trust. Its structure provides high liquidity and transparent exposure to established U.S. blue-chip companies, distinguishing it through simplicity and long-standing market recognition since 1998.

VictoryShares Free Cash Flow ETF (VFLO) Overview

The VictoryShares Free Cash Flow ETF (VFLO) seeks to track the Victory U.S. Large Cap Free Cash Flow Index before fees and expenses. It employs a rules-based methodology selecting around 50 U.S. large-cap companies based on high free cash flow yields combined with growth filters. Holdings typically feature names such as Adobe, Expedia Group, Newmont, Devon Energy, and Accenture. Sector weights often highlight information technology, energy, and healthcare. The ETF carries a net expense ratio of 0.39% and follows a passive, open-ended structure with quarterly rebalancing. Launched in 2023, VFLO provides targeted exposure to companies demonstrating strong cash generation potential within the large-cap segment.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

U.S. large-cap equities continue to navigate a landscape shaped by monetary policy expectations, corporate earnings quality, and sector rotation dynamics. Free cash flow metrics have gained prominence as investors prioritize companies capable of generating sustainable cash after capital expenditures amid varying interest rate environments. Energy and technology sectors have experienced capital inflows driven by commodity trends and innovation cycles, while financials and industrials reflect sensitivity to economic growth indicators. Regulatory developments around corporate taxation and capital allocation further influence positioning. Both ETFs operate within this environment, where emphasis on established market leaders versus cash-flow-efficient firms can affect relative resilience across market cycles.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, DIA has reflected the performance characteristics of its price-weighted blue-chip constituents, showing sensitivity to movements in high-priced components and broader equity trends. VFLO’s free cash flow and growth-oriented selection has positioned it differently, potentially benefiting from rotations toward quality names in sectors such as technology and energy during periods of earnings focus. Relative volatility may vary based on sector concentration, with DIA offering more diversified blue-chip stability and VFLO providing differentiated exposure tied to cash generation metrics. Both have participated in large-cap equity movements, though their distinct construction influences responses to interest rate shifts and sector-specific catalysts.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Investors comparing ETFs like DIA and VFLO can leverage the tool to refine searches aligned with specific objectives.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors including lower expense ratio, established liquidity profile, and broad diversification across blue-chip holdings, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probability of preference to the State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust (DIA) for investors prioritizing cost efficiency and market representation. The VictoryShares Free Cash Flow ETF (VFLO) offers compelling differentiation through its free cash flow methodology but carries a higher expense ratio and more concentrated thematic exposure.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
DIA vs. VFLO commentary
Sep 07, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DIA is a Hold and VFLO is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DIA has more net assets: 46.4B vs. VFLO (11.3B). VFLO has a higher annual dividend yield than DIA: VFLO (41.047) vs DIA (12.091). DIA was incepted earlier than VFLO: DIA (29 years) vs VFLO (3 years). DIA (0.16) has a lower expense ratio than VFLO (0.39). VFLO has a higher turnover DIA (8.00) vs DIA (8.00).
DIAVFLODIA / VFLO
Gain YTD12.09141.04729%
Net Assets46.4B11.3B411%
Total Expense Ratio0.160.3941%
Turnover8.00142.006%
Yield1.381.01137%
Fund Existence29 years3 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DIAVFLO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
89%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
88%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DIA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
VFLO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FPXE33.130.03
+0.08%
First Trust IPOX Europe Equity Opps ETF
BUFY24.09N/A
N/A
FT Vest Laddered Intl Mod Buffr ETF
FELG44.47-0.02
-0.04%
Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF
AGGH19.56-0.16
-0.81%
Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF
MEDI34.37-0.30
-0.87%
Harbor Health Care ETF

DIA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DIA has been closely correlated with GS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DIA jumps, then GS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DIA
1D Price
Change %
DIA100%
-0.53%
GS - DIA
72%
Closely correlated
+0.07%
JPM - DIA
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.94%
AXP - DIA
62%
Loosely correlated
-1.11%
SOLV - DIA
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.81%
DOW - DIA
59%
Loosely correlated
-3.03%
More

VFLO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VFLO has been loosely correlated with ABNB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VFLO jumps, then ABNB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VFLO
1D Price
Change %
VFLO100%
-1.39%
ABNB - VFLO
57%
Loosely correlated
-1.79%
ALGN - VFLO
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.76%
NTAP - VFLO
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.11%
DOCU - VFLO
50%
Loosely correlated
+3.70%
PAYX - VFLO
49%
Loosely correlated
-2.69%
More