DIN
Price
$30.39
Change
+$0.29 (+0.96%)
Updated
Dec 20 closing price
66 days until earnings call
NDLS
Price
$0.72
Change
+$0.04 (+5.88%)
Updated
Dec 20, 04:59 PM (EDT)
60 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

DIN vs NDLS

Header iconDIN vs NDLS Comparison
Open Charts DIN vs NDLSBanner chart's image
Dine Brands Global
Price$30.39
Change+$0.29 (+0.96%)
Volume$890.34K
CapitalizationN/A
Noodles & Company
Price$0.72
Change+$0.04 (+5.88%)
Volume$2.02K
CapitalizationN/A
DIN vs NDLS Comparison Chart
Loading...
DIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NDLS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DIN vs. NDLS commentary
Dec 22, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DIN is a Hold and NDLS is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 22, 2024
Stock price -- (DIN: $30.39 vs. NDLS: $0.72)
Brand notoriety: DIN: Not notable vs. NDLS: Notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DIN: 176% vs. NDLS: 88%
Market capitalization -- DIN: $463.34M vs. NDLS: $32.88M
DIN [@Restaurants] is valued at $463.34M. NDLS’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $32.88M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $209.74B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.18B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DIN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNDLS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • DIN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NDLS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, DIN is a better buy in the long-term than NDLS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DIN’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NDLS’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DIN’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • NDLS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NDLS is a better buy in the short-term than DIN.

Price Growth

DIN (@Restaurants) experienced а -0.79% price change this week, while NDLS (@Restaurants) price change was +3.90% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -2.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.46%.

Reported Earning Dates

DIN is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2025.

NDLS is expected to report earnings on Feb 20, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-2.31% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DIN($463M) has a higher market cap than NDLS($32.9M). DIN YTD gains are higher at: -35.111 vs. NDLS (-77.143). DIN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 219M vs. NDLS (4.49M). NDLS has less debt than DIN: NDLS (289M) vs DIN (1.59B). DIN has higher revenues than NDLS: DIN (814M) vs NDLS (496M).
DINNDLSDIN / NDLS
Capitalization463M32.9M1,407%
EBITDA219M4.49M4,873%
Gain YTD-35.111-77.14346%
P/E Ratio5.06N/A-
Revenue814M496M164%
Total CashN/A3.31M-
Total Debt1.59B289M549%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DIN vs NDLS: Fundamental Ratings
DIN
NDLS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
688
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
6
Undervalued
84
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
10099
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6265
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9394
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DIN's Valuation (6) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for NDLS (84). This means that DIN’s stock grew significantly faster than NDLS’s over the last 12 months.

DIN's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as NDLS (100). This means that DIN’s stock grew similarly to NDLS’s over the last 12 months.

NDLS's SMR Rating (99) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as DIN (100). This means that NDLS’s stock grew similarly to DIN’s over the last 12 months.

DIN's Price Growth Rating (62) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as NDLS (65). This means that DIN’s stock grew similarly to NDLS’s over the last 12 months.

DIN's P/E Growth Rating (93) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as NDLS (94). This means that DIN’s stock grew similarly to NDLS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DINNDLS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
DIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NDLS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HCMNX19.250.36
+1.91%
HCM Dividend Sector Plus A
GWILX15.500.19
+1.24%
Glenmede Women in Leadership US Eq
BIIGX35.480.41
+1.17%
Buffalo Growth Institutional
TCVIX22.940.24
+1.06%
Touchstone Mid Cap Value Inst
UCNQX50.840.42
+0.83%
Victory Nasdaq 100 Index C

NDLS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NDLS has been loosely correlated with FRSH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NDLS jumps, then FRSH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NDLS
1D Price
Change %
NDLS100%
+5.88%
FRSH - NDLS
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.45%
RRGB - NDLS
33%
Loosely correlated
+5.99%
CAKE - NDLS
33%
Poorly correlated
-0.33%
TXRH - NDLS
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.81%
DIN - NDLS
30%
Poorly correlated
+2.70%
More