Advertisement
FRSH vs NDLS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRSH is a Hold and NDLS is a Hold.
Momentum Indicator for FRSH turns positive, indicating new upward trend
FRSH saw its Momentum Indicator move above the 0 level on September 30, 2026. This is an indication that the stock could be shifting in to a new upward move. Traders may want to consider buying the stock or buying call options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 101 similar instances where the indicator turned positive. In 77 of the 101 cases, the stock moved higher in the following days. The odds of a move higher are at 76%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for FRSH just turned positive on October 01, 2026. Looking at past instances where FRSH's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 38 of 51 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 75%.
Following a +2.35% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where FRSH advanced for three days, in 205 of 291 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 70%.
The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 134 of 180 cases where FRSH Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 74%.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the overbought zone for 9 days. The longer the ticker stays in the overbought zone, the sooner a price pull-back is expected.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where FRSH declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 78%.
FRSH broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 06, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 9 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to outstanding earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 36 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. FRSH’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 47 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 59 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (3.650) is normal, around the industry mean (51.922). P/E Ratio (19.905) is within average values for comparable stocks, (82.636). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.509) is also within normal values, averaging (3.135). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.011) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (3.995) is also within normal values, averaging (70.810).
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 87 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. FRSH’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 94, placing this stock better than average.
NDLS in upward trend: price may ascend as a result of having broken its lower Bollinger Band on September 16, 2026
NDLS may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options. In 36 of 43 cases where NDLS's price broke its lower Bollinger Band, its price rose further in the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 84%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 05, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on NDLS as a result. In 64 of 85 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 75%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for NDLS just turned positive on September 29, 2026. Looking at past instances where NDLS's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 44 of 56 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 79%.
Following a +4.10% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where NDLS advanced for three days, in 180 of 239 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 75%.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Stochastic Oscillator may be shifting from an upward trend to a downward trend. In 51 of 55 cases where NDLS's Stochastic Oscillator exited the overbought zone, the price fell further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 90%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where NDLS declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 89%.
The Aroon Indicator for NDLS entered a downward trend on October 07, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 35 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. NDLS’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 50 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 73 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (15.175) is normal, around the industry mean (5.328). P/E Ratio (69.444) is within average values for comparable stocks, (37.793). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (1.610) is also within normal values, averaging (7.754). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.020) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (0.157) is also within normal values, averaging (2.618).
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 90 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 99 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. NDLS’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 85, placing this stock worse than average.
FRSH | NDLS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 11 | 25 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 59 Fair valued | 73 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 87 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 47 | 99 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 36 | 35 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 9 | 90 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FRSH's Valuation (59) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as NDLS (73). This means that FRSH’s stock grew similarly to NDLS’s over the last 12 months.
FRSH's Profit vs Risk Rating (87) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as NDLS (100). This means that FRSH’s stock grew similarly to NDLS’s over the last 12 months.
FRSH's SMR Rating (47) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NDLS (99). This means that FRSH’s stock grew somewhat faster than NDLS’s over the last 12 months.
NDLS's Price Growth Rating (35) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as FRSH (36). This means that NDLS’s stock grew similarly to FRSH’s over the last 12 months.
FRSH's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for NDLS (90). This means that FRSH’s stock grew significantly faster than NDLS’s over the last 12 months.
| FRSH | NDLS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 75% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 70% | 7 days ago 75% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 11 days ago 89% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 81% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FRSH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while NDLS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- FRSH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- NDLS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FRSH’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NDLS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FRSH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
- NDLS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
FRSH (@Packaged Software) experienced а +0.66% price change this week, while NDLS (@Restaurants) price change was -1.54% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.17%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +3.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.24%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.80%.
Reported Earning Dates
FRSH is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2026.
NDLS is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (-1.86% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
@Restaurants (+3.18% weekly)The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| INCM | 28.77 | 0.05 | +0.17% |
| Franklin Income Focus ETF (INCM) | |||
| ATTR | 96.43 | N/A | N/A |
| Arin Tactical Tail Risk ETF | |||
| JXI | 80.25 | -0.08 | -0.10% |
| iShares Global Utilities ETF (JXI) | |||
| SEPP | 33.35 | -0.22 | -0.65% |
| PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - September (SEPP) | |||
| HQGO | 67.48 | -0.75 | -1.11% |
| Hartford US Quality Growth ETF (HQGO) | |||