DNZOF
Price
$14.39
Change
+$0.79 (+5.81%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
52.56B
MNRO
Price
$16.75
Change
+$0.11 (+0.66%)
Updated
Jul 3, 12:44 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
915.6M
20 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

DNZOF vs MNRO

Header iconDNZOF vs MNRO Comparison
Open Charts DNZOF vs MNROBanner chart's image
Denso
Price$14.39
Change+$0.79 (+5.81%)
Volume$491
Capitalization52.56B
Monro
Price$16.75
Change+$0.11 (+0.66%)
Volume$1.41K
Capitalization915.6M
DNZOF vs MNRO Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
DNZOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MNRO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DNZOF vs. MNRO commentary
Jul 03, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DNZOF is a Hold and MNRO is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 03, 2025
Stock price -- (DNZOF: $14.39 vs. MNRO: $16.62)
Brand notoriety: DNZOF and MNRO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DNZOF: 19% vs. MNRO: 82%
Market capitalization -- DNZOF: $52.56B vs. MNRO: $915.6M
DNZOF [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $52.56B. MNRO’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $915.6M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $52.56B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $5.73B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DNZOF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMNRO’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • DNZOF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MNRO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, DNZOF is a better buy in the long-term than MNRO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DNZOF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MNRO’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DNZOF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MNRO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MNRO is a better buy in the short-term than DNZOF.

Price Growth

DNZOF (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а +5.32% price change this week, while MNRO (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was +21.14% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was +3.54%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.45%.

Reported Earning Dates

MNRO is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (+3.54% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DNZOF($52.6B) has a higher market cap than MNRO($916M). MNRO has higher P/E ratio than DNZOF: MNRO (28.35) vs DNZOF (23.36). DNZOF YTD gains are higher at: -2.770 vs. MNRO (-30.705). DNZOF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 835B vs. MNRO (141M). DNZOF has more cash in the bank: 768B vs. MNRO (23.8M). MNRO has less debt than DNZOF: MNRO (616M) vs DNZOF (889B). DNZOF has higher revenues than MNRO: DNZOF (6.4T) vs MNRO (1.28B).
DNZOFMNRODNZOF / MNRO
Capitalization52.6B916M5,742%
EBITDA835B141M592,199%
Gain YTD-2.770-30.7059%
P/E Ratio23.3628.3582%
Revenue6.4T1.28B500,861%
Total Cash768B23.8M3,226,891%
Total Debt889B616M144,318%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DNZOF vs MNRO: Fundamental Ratings
DNZOF
MNRO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
515
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
22
Undervalued
6
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
67100
SMR RATING
1..100
190
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6161
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9358
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MNRO's Valuation (6) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as DNZOF (22) in the null industry. This means that MNRO’s stock grew similarly to DNZOF’s over the last 12 months.

DNZOF's Profit vs Risk Rating (67) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MNRO (100) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that DNZOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MNRO’s over the last 12 months.

DNZOF's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MNRO (90) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that DNZOF’s stock grew significantly faster than MNRO’s over the last 12 months.

DNZOF's Price Growth Rating (61) in the null industry is in the same range as MNRO (61) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that DNZOF’s stock grew similarly to MNRO’s over the last 12 months.

MNRO's P/E Growth Rating (58) in the Specialty Stores industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DNZOF (93) in the null industry. This means that MNRO’s stock grew somewhat faster than DNZOF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DNZOFMNRO
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
72%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DNZOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MNRO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SYNA68.361.95
+2.94%
Synaptics
LNZA0.29N/A
+0.91%
LanzaTech Global
GNPX0.27N/A
+0.01%
Genprex
DPZ454.39-3.14
-0.69%
Dominos Pizza Inc
FTLF13.61-0.53
-3.75%
FitLife Brands Inc

DNZOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DNZOF and CTTAF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DNZOF and CTTAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DNZOF
1D Price
Change %
DNZOF100%
+5.81%
CTTAF - DNZOF
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.86%
DNZOY - DNZOF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.22%
DAN - DNZOF
17%
Poorly correlated
+1.54%
MBLY - DNZOF
13%
Poorly correlated
+5.12%
MNRO - DNZOF
13%
Poorly correlated
+4.08%
More

MNRO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MNRO has been loosely correlated with HYLN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MNRO jumps, then HYLN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MNRO
1D Price
Change %
MNRO100%
+4.08%
HYLN - MNRO
44%
Loosely correlated
+2.19%
THRM - MNRO
42%
Loosely correlated
+3.23%
LIMAF - MNRO
42%
Loosely correlated
+3.58%
FOXF - MNRO
41%
Loosely correlated
+2.15%
AXL - MNRO
37%
Loosely correlated
+3.06%
More