Advertisement
GPC vs MNRO
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Genuine Parts Company (GPC) vs. Monro, Inc. (MNRO) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- GPC shares rose approximately 18% over the recent 30-day period, primarily driven by reports of a potential $10 billion acquisition bid for its NAPA division.
- MNRO reported fiscal fourth-quarter results in late May 2026 that missed estimates, with revenue declining year-over-year amid ongoing operational challenges.
- Both companies operate in the automotive aftermarket sector, but GPC maintains broader global exposure through its industrial segment while MNRO focuses on retail service centers.
- GPC is scheduled to release second-quarter results on July 21, 2026, with analysts expecting modest revenue growth.
- MNRO plans to report first-quarter fiscal 2027 results on July 29, 2026, following a full-year fiscal 2026 revenue decline of 3.2%.
- Recent market activity highlights a contrast in momentum, with GPC benefiting from strategic corporate developments and MNRO navigating earnings pressures.
Introduction
Investors and traders frequently compare stocks within the same industry to assess relative performance, risk profiles, and market positioning. Genuine Parts Company (GPC) and Monro, Inc. (MNRO) both participate in the automotive aftermarket, offering exposure to vehicle maintenance and parts distribution. This comparison appeals to sector-focused investors seeking to understand how differing business models, recent catalysts, and earnings trajectories influence short- and medium-term positioning in the current environment.
GPC Overview and Recent Performance
Genuine Parts Company operates as a leading global distributor of automotive and industrial replacement parts, serving customers through brands including NAPA. In recent weeks, GPC shares experienced notable upward movement amid reports of a potential acquisition of its NAPA automotive division. The stock advanced roughly 18% over the 30-day period ending mid-July 2026, with a sharp single-day gain exceeding 12% following the acquisition-related news. Broader market activity reflected increased trading volume on the announcement day. The company is set to report second-quarter 2026 results later in July, with consensus expectations pointing to revenue around $6.39 billion. Earlier quarterly results demonstrated sales growth supported by comparable-store gains and acquisitions.
MNRO Overview and Recent Performance
Monro, Inc. provides automotive repair and maintenance services through a network of retail service centers across the United States. Recent market activity for MNRO followed the company’s fiscal fourth-quarter earnings release in late May 2026, which showed an earnings-per-share miss and a year-over-year revenue decline. Fiscal 2026 full-year revenue totaled $1.157 billion, down 3.2% from the prior year. The company is scheduled to report first-quarter fiscal 2027 results at the end of July. Sentiment in recent weeks has reflected ongoing efforts to address operational headwinds in a competitive service environment, with limited positive catalysts emerging in the immediate period.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates a selection of high-performing automated trading systems from hundreds of available AI trading bots that analyze and trade thousands of different tickers. Only the most suitable bots for prevailing market conditions earn placement in this section, based on backtested performance metrics, win rates, and risk-adjusted returns that can vary widely across strategies. Available bots encompass diverse trading styles, timeframes, and ticker sets, with statistics such as success rates often ranging from 60% to over 80% in optimized scenarios and average trade durations spanning minutes to weeks. This resource provides traders with transparent access to varied algorithmic approaches. Explore the full collection on the Trending AI Robots page.
Head-to-Head Comparison
GPC and MNRO differ meaningfully in scale and focus. GPC combines automotive parts distribution with a substantial industrial segment, providing diversified revenue streams and international reach. MNRO operates a more concentrated retail service model centered on tire, brake, and maintenance work. Recent momentum favors GPC following the acquisition-related catalyst, while MNRO has faced earnings shortfalls and revenue contraction. Risk factors for GPC include integration or separation costs tied to corporate restructuring plans, whereas MNRO contends with margin pressure in a service-intensive business. Sector exposure remains similar, yet market sentiment has diverged sharply in recent activity, with GPC displaying stronger trend consistency amid external interest.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency and the presence of a clear positive catalyst, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probabilistic preference to GPC over MNRO. The recent acquisition-related momentum and upcoming earnings release provide a more defined positioning relative to MNRO’s earnings miss and revenue decline, though outcomes remain subject to broader market conditions and execution.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GPC is a Hold and MNRO is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GPC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMNRO’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- GPC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- MNRO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GPC’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MNRO’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- GPC’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
- MNRO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
GPC (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а +0.13% price change this week, while MNRO (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was -27.04% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was -1.79%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -9.58%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.28%.
Reported Earning Dates
GPC is expected to report earnings on Oct 15, 2026.
MNRO is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Auto Parts: OEM (-1.79% weekly)OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.
| GPC | MNRO | GPC / MNRO | |
| Capitalization | 17.1B | 383M | 4,465% |
| EBITDA | 742M | 91.5M | 811% |
| Gain YTD | 3.184 | -36.984 | -9% |
| P/E Ratio | 497.48 | 53.26 | 934% |
| Revenue | 25.1B | 1.14B | 2,196% |
| Total Cash | 559M | 9.53M | 5,868% |
| Total Debt | 6.65B | 528M | 1,260% |
GPC | MNRO | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 69 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 89 Overvalued | 4 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 88 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 91 | 90 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 47 | 83 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 1 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MNRO's Valuation (4) in the Specialty Stores industry is significantly better than the same rating for GPC (89) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that MNRO’s stock grew significantly faster than GPC’s over the last 12 months.
GPC's Profit vs Risk Rating (88) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is in the same range as MNRO (100) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that GPC’s stock grew similarly to MNRO’s over the last 12 months.
MNRO's SMR Rating (90) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as GPC (91) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that MNRO’s stock grew similarly to GPC’s over the last 12 months.
GPC's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MNRO (83) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that GPC’s stock grew somewhat faster than MNRO’s over the last 12 months.
GPC's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is significantly better than the same rating for MNRO (100) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that GPC’s stock grew significantly faster than MNRO’s over the last 12 months.
| GPC | MNRO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 54% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 52% | 3 days ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 55% | 3 days ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 53% | 3 days ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 59% | 3 days ago 76% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 56% | 3 days ago 74% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 60% | 6 days ago 64% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 56% | 11 days ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 65% | 3 days ago 54% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 42% | 3 days ago 64% |
Advertisement
GPC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GPC has been loosely correlated with CPRT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GPC jumps, then CPRT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GPC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPC | 100% | -0.37% | ||
| CPRT - GPC | 58% Loosely correlated | -1.51% | ||
| LKQ - GPC | 54% Loosely correlated | -0.66% | ||
| AAP - GPC | 50% Loosely correlated | -1.16% | ||
| MNRO - GPC | 46% Loosely correlated | -8.89% | ||
| LOW - GPC | 42% Loosely correlated | -1.08% | ||
More | ||||
MNRO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MNRO has been loosely correlated with PHIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MNRO jumps, then PHIN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MNRO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MNRO | 100% | -8.89% | ||
| PHIN - MNRO | 50% Loosely correlated | +0.73% | ||
| LEA - MNRO | 45% Loosely correlated | -10.72% | ||
| ALV - MNRO | 45% Loosely correlated | -0.80% | ||
| LKQ - MNRO | 43% Loosely correlated | -0.66% | ||
| MGA - MNRO | 43% Loosely correlated | -1.79% | ||
More | ||||