MNRO
Price
$17.60
Change
+$0.39 (+2.27%)
Updated
Jul 16, 02:43 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
537.76M
20 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PHIN
Price
$80.60
Change
+$1.07 (+1.35%)
Updated
Jul 16, 02:40 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.94B
14 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MNRO vs PHIN

MNRO vs PHIN Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MNRO vs. PHIN commentary
Jul 16, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MNRO is a Hold and PHIN is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 16, 2026
Stock price -- (MNRO: $17.21 vs. PHIN: $79.53)
Brand notoriety: MNRO and PHIN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MNRO: 26% vs. PHIN: 71%
Market capitalization -- MNRO: $537.76M vs. PHIN: $2.94B
MNRO [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $537.76M. PHIN’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $2.94B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $68.56B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $5.22B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MNRO’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePHIN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MNRO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PHIN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both MNRO and PHIN are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MNRO’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PHIN’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MNRO’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • PHIN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MNRO is a better buy in the short-term than PHIN.

Price Growth

MNRO (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а +4.05% price change this week, while PHIN (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was +3.39% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was -0.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.10%.

Reported Earning Dates

MNRO is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.

PHIN is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (-0.01% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PHIN($2.94B) has a higher market cap than MNRO($538M). MNRO has higher P/E ratio than PHIN: MNRO (573.67) vs PHIN (22.28). PHIN YTD gains are higher at: 27.889 vs. MNRO (-11.469). PHIN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 447M vs. MNRO (81.7M). MNRO has less debt than PHIN: MNRO (486M) vs PHIN (1.04B). PHIN has higher revenues than MNRO: PHIN (3.57B) vs MNRO (1.16B).
MNROPHINMNRO / PHIN
Capitalization538M2.94B18%
EBITDA81.7M447M18%
Gain YTD-11.46927.889-41%
P/E Ratio573.6722.282,575%
Revenue1.16B3.57B32%
Total Cash14.6MN/A-
Total Debt486M1.04B47%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MNRO: Fundamental Ratings
MNRO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
26
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
79
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
91
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
49
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
45
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MNROPHIN
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
49%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MNRO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PHIN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NAN11.680.04
+0.33%
Nuveen New York Quality Municipal Income Fund
MAGG20.100.04
+0.20%
Madison Aggregate Bond ETF
QCOC23.94N/A
-0.02%
FT Vest Nasdaq-100® Cnsrv Buffr ETF -Oct
MDYG108.35-0.07
-0.06%
State Street® SPDR® S&P 400™ Md Cp GrETF
LUNL4.54-0.05
-1.09%
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long LUNR ETF

MNRO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MNRO has been loosely correlated with PHIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MNRO jumps, then PHIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MNRO
1D Price
Change %
MNRO100%
-0.69%
PHIN - MNRO
50%
Loosely correlated
+1.64%
LEA - MNRO
47%
Loosely correlated
+3.30%
ALV - MNRO
45%
Loosely correlated
+1.07%
GT - MNRO
44%
Loosely correlated
+1.20%
LKQ - MNRO
43%
Loosely correlated
+0.24%
More

PHIN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PHIN has been loosely correlated with LEA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PHIN jumps, then LEA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PHIN
1D Price
Change %
PHIN100%
+1.64%
LEA - PHIN
57%
Loosely correlated
+3.30%
DAN - PHIN
56%
Loosely correlated
+2.40%
MGA - PHIN
55%
Loosely correlated
+2.63%
BWA - PHIN
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.05%
THRM - PHIN
54%
Loosely correlated
+2.28%
More