Advertisement
DPZ vs LBAY
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DPZ is a Buy and LBAY is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
DPZ’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while.
- DPZ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
DPZ’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- DPZ’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
DPZ (@Restaurants) experienced а -1.70% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -0.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.55%.
Reported Earning Dates
DPZ is expected to report earnings on Oct 14, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Restaurants (-0.28% weekly)The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.
DPZ | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 53 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 69 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 88 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 54 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 90 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| DPZ | LBAY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 68% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 66% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 76% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 19 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 54% | 17 days ago 68% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 74% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| LGLV | 174.90 | -0.85 | -0.48% |
| SPDR® SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatil ETF | |||
| GEND | 11.25 | -0.06 | -0.57% |
| Genter Capital Dividend Income ETF | |||
| WDIV | 71.73 | -0.53 | -0.74% |
| SPDR® S&P Global Dividend ETF | |||
| ENOR | 28.60 | -0.38 | -1.31% |
| iShares MSCI Norway ETF | |||
| RDTL | 60.22 | -1.73 | -2.79% |
| GraniteShares 2x Long RDDT Daily ETF | |||
DPZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DPZ has been loosely correlated with YUM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DPZ jumps, then YUM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DPZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DPZ | 100% | -0.60% | ||
| YUM - DPZ | 49% Loosely correlated | +0.64% | ||
| QSR - DPZ | 46% Loosely correlated | +0.11% | ||
| FRSH - DPZ | 39% Loosely correlated | -2.58% | ||
| CAKE - DPZ | 39% Loosely correlated | -1.15% | ||
| MCD - DPZ | 39% Loosely correlated | -0.67% | ||
More | ||||
LBAY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that LBAY and QSR have been poorly correlated (+15% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LBAY and QSR's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LBAY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LBAY | 100% | +0.31% | ||
| QSR - LBAY | 15% Poorly correlated | +0.11% | ||
| ZIMV - LBAY | 14% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| DE - LBAY | 10% Poorly correlated | -0.48% | ||
| JNJ - LBAY | 8% Poorly correlated | +0.59% | ||
| DPZ - LBAY | 8% Poorly correlated | -0.60% | ||
More | ||||