Advertisement
DPZ vs MAA
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DPZ is a Buy and MAA is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
DPZ’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMAA’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- DPZ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- MAA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
DPZ’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MAA’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- DPZ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- MAA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
DPZ (@Restaurants) experienced а -0.75% price change this week, while MAA (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was -3.02% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -1.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.92%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.50%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was -2.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.73%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.16%.
Reported Earning Dates
DPZ is expected to report earnings on Jul 17, 2025.
MAA is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Restaurants (-1.80% weekly)The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.
@Real Estate Investment Trusts (-2.51% weekly)A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.
| DPZ | MAA | DPZ / MAA | |
| Capitalization | 16.5B | 15.4B | 107% |
| EBITDA | 1.05B | 1.29B | 82% |
| Gain YTD | 15.358 | 2.956 | 520% |
| P/E Ratio | 27.65 | 27.32 | 101% |
| Revenue | 4.73B | 2.15B | 220% |
| Total Cash | 304M | 41.3M | 736% |
| Total Debt | 5.21B | 4.57B | 114% |
DPZ | MAA | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 14 | 67 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 71 Overvalued | 77 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 57 | 53 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 70 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 52 | 52 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 69 | 33 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
DPZ's Valuation (71) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as MAA (77) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that DPZ’s stock grew similarly to MAA’s over the last 12 months.
MAA's Profit vs Risk Rating (53) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as DPZ (57) in the Restaurants industry. This means that MAA’s stock grew similarly to DPZ’s over the last 12 months.
MAA's SMR Rating (70) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as DPZ (100) in the Restaurants industry. This means that MAA’s stock grew similarly to DPZ’s over the last 12 months.
MAA's Price Growth Rating (52) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as DPZ (52) in the Restaurants industry. This means that MAA’s stock grew similarly to DPZ’s over the last 12 months.
MAA's P/E Growth Rating (33) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DPZ (69) in the Restaurants industry. This means that MAA’s stock grew somewhat faster than DPZ’s over the last 12 months.
| DPZ | MAA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 38% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | 2 days ago 35% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 46% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 45% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 67% | 8 days ago 61% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 53% | 2 days ago 49% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 49% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 62% |
Advertisement
DPZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DPZ has been loosely correlated with QSR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DPZ jumps, then QSR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DPZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DPZ | 100% | +0.37% | ||
| QSR - DPZ | 43% Loosely correlated | +0.01% | ||
| YUM - DPZ | 41% Loosely correlated | -0.64% | ||
| FRSH - DPZ | 39% Loosely correlated | +0.83% | ||
| CNNE - DPZ | 38% Loosely correlated | +0.79% | ||
| PZZA - DPZ | 37% Loosely correlated | +3.73% | ||
More | ||||
MAA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MAA has been closely correlated with CPT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 92% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MAA jumps, then CPT could also see price increases.