DPZ
Price
$414.86
Change
-$6.90 (-1.64%)
Updated
Oct 24 closing price
Capitalization
14.02B
115 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
MCD
Price
$305.79
Change
-$1.18 (-0.38%)
Updated
Oct 24 closing price
Capitalization
218.21B
9 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

DPZ vs MCD

Header iconDPZ vs MCD Comparison
Open Charts DPZ vs MCDBanner chart's image
Dominos Pizza
Price$414.86
Change-$6.90 (-1.64%)
Volume$482.58K
Capitalization14.02B
McDonald's
Price$305.79
Change-$1.18 (-0.38%)
Volume$1.99M
Capitalization218.21B
DPZ vs MCD Comparison Chart in %
DPZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MCD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DPZ vs. MCD commentary
Oct 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DPZ is a Hold and MCD is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 27, 2025
Stock price -- (DPZ: $414.86 vs. MCD: $305.79)
Brand notoriety: DPZ and MCD are both notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DPZ: 73% vs. MCD: 69%
Market capitalization -- DPZ: $14.02B vs. MCD: $218.21B
DPZ [@Restaurants] is valued at $14.02B. MCD’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $218.21B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $218.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $7.85B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DPZ’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMCD’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • DPZ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MCD’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MCD is a better buy in the long-term than DPZ.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DPZ’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MCD’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DPZ’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MCD’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MCD is a better buy in the short-term than DPZ.

Price Growth

DPZ (@Restaurants) experienced а -0.34% price change this week, while MCD (@Restaurants) price change was -0.75% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +0.63%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.07%.

Reported Earning Dates

DPZ is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2026.

MCD is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (+0.63% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCD($218B) has a higher market cap than DPZ($14B). MCD has higher P/E ratio than DPZ: MCD (26.20) vs DPZ (24.25). MCD YTD gains are higher at: 7.301 vs. DPZ (0.005). MCD has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 14.2B vs. DPZ (1.05B). DPZ has less debt than MCD: DPZ (5.21B) vs MCD (55.9B). MCD has higher revenues than DPZ: MCD (26.1B) vs DPZ (4.78B).
DPZMCDDPZ / MCD
Capitalization14B218B6%
EBITDA1.05B14.2B7%
Gain YTD0.0057.3010%
P/E Ratio24.2526.2093%
Revenue4.78B26.1B18%
Total CashN/A1.88B-
Total Debt5.21B55.9B9%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DPZ vs MCD: Fundamental Ratings
DPZ
MCD
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6418
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
68
Overvalued
65
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9219
SMR RATING
1..100
1008
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6356
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5447
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8575

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MCD's Valuation (65) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as DPZ (68). This means that MCD’s stock grew similarly to DPZ’s over the last 12 months.

MCD's Profit vs Risk Rating (19) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for DPZ (92). This means that MCD’s stock grew significantly faster than DPZ’s over the last 12 months.

MCD's SMR Rating (8) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for DPZ (100). This means that MCD’s stock grew significantly faster than DPZ’s over the last 12 months.

MCD's Price Growth Rating (56) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as DPZ (63). This means that MCD’s stock grew similarly to DPZ’s over the last 12 months.

MCD's P/E Growth Rating (47) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as DPZ (54). This means that MCD’s stock grew similarly to DPZ’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DPZMCD
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
46%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
32%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
45%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
46%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
37%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
42%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
41%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
39%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
44%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
40%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DPZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MCD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SCHB26.130.20
+0.77%
Schwab US Broad Market ETF™
FOWF31.710.15
+0.49%
Pacer Solactive Whitney Fut of Wrfr ETF
JIVE76.230.24
+0.31%
JPMorgan International Value ETF
UJAN42.430.05
+0.12%
Innovator US Equity Ultra Buff ETF™ Jan
ENOR28.50-0.33
-1.15%
iShares MSCI Norway ETF

DPZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DPZ has been loosely correlated with YUM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DPZ jumps, then YUM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DPZ
1D Price
Change %
DPZ100%
-1.64%
YUM - DPZ
51%
Loosely correlated
-2.06%
QSR - DPZ
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.04%
MCD - DPZ
39%
Loosely correlated
-0.38%
FRSH - DPZ
39%
Loosely correlated
-0.26%
CAKE - DPZ
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.41%
More

MCD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCD has been loosely correlated with YUM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MCD jumps, then YUM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCD
1D Price
Change %
MCD100%
-0.38%
YUM - MCD
62%
Loosely correlated
-2.06%
QSR - MCD
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.04%
DPZ - MCD
38%
Loosely correlated
-1.64%
ARCO - MCD
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.28%
PZZA - MCD
27%
Poorly correlated
+4.52%
More