DPZ
Price
$485.65
Change
+$9.31 (+1.95%)
Updated
Jul 25, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
16.17B
76 days until earnings call
NIHL
Price
$0.10
Change
+$0.04 (+66.67%)
Updated
Jul 21 closing price
Capitalization
48.85M
Interact to see
Advertisement

DPZ vs NIHL

Header iconDPZ vs NIHL Comparison
Open Charts DPZ vs NIHLBanner chart's image
Dominos Pizza
Price$485.65
Change+$9.31 (+1.95%)
Volume$2.42K
Capitalization16.17B
New Infinity Holdings
Price$0.10
Change+$0.04 (+66.67%)
Volume$2.15K
Capitalization48.85M
DPZ vs NIHL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
DPZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NIHL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DPZ vs. NIHL commentary
Jul 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DPZ is a Hold and NIHL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 26, 2025
Stock price -- (DPZ: $476.34 vs. NIHL: $0.10)
Brand notoriety: DPZ: Notable vs. NIHL: Not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DPZ: 115% vs. NIHL: 32%
Market capitalization -- DPZ: $16.17B vs. NIHL: $48.85M
DPZ [@Restaurants] is valued at $16.17B. NIHL’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $48.85M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $210.56B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.12B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DPZ’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNIHL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • DPZ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NIHL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, NIHL is a better buy in the long-term than DPZ.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DPZ’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NIHL’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DPZ’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NIHL’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NIHL is a better buy in the short-term than DPZ.

Price Growth

DPZ (@Restaurants) experienced а +1.63% price change this week, while NIHL (@Restaurants) price change was +65.38% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +2.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.40%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.75%.

Reported Earning Dates

DPZ is expected to report earnings on Oct 09, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (+2.25% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DPZ($16.2B) has a higher market cap than NIHL($48.8M). DPZ YTD gains are higher at: 14.383 vs. NIHL (-90.110).
DPZNIHLDPZ / NIHL
Capitalization16.2B48.8M33,197%
EBITDA1.05BN/A-
Gain YTD14.383-90.110-16%
P/E Ratio27.66N/A-
Revenue4.73BN/A-
Total Cash304MN/A-
Total Debt5.21BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DPZ vs NIHL: Fundamental Ratings
DPZ
NIHL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5991
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
72
Overvalued
2
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
63100
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5249
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
46100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NIHL's Valuation (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for DPZ (72) in the Restaurants industry. This means that NIHL’s stock grew significantly faster than DPZ’s over the last 12 months.

DPZ's Profit vs Risk Rating (63) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NIHL (100) in the null industry. This means that DPZ’s stock grew somewhat faster than NIHL’s over the last 12 months.

DPZ's SMR Rating (100) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as NIHL (100) in the null industry. This means that DPZ’s stock grew similarly to NIHL’s over the last 12 months.

NIHL's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as DPZ (52) in the Restaurants industry. This means that NIHL’s stock grew similarly to DPZ’s over the last 12 months.

DPZ's P/E Growth Rating (46) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NIHL (100) in the null industry. This means that DPZ’s stock grew somewhat faster than NIHL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DPZNIHL
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
20%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
31%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
24%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
29%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
66%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
35%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DPZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NIHL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EGMCF0.02N/A
+9.00%
Emergent Metals Corp.
BPIRF8.00N/A
N/A
Piraeus Financial Holdings S.A.
HGHAF0.62N/A
N/A
HIGH ARCTIC ENERGY SVCS INC NEW
NPACY1.51N/A
N/A
Quadient SA
SOAGY45.24-0.71
-1.55%
Sartorius AG

DPZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DPZ has been loosely correlated with YUM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DPZ jumps, then YUM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DPZ
1D Price
Change %
DPZ100%
-0.36%
YUM - DPZ
45%
Loosely correlated
-1.33%
QSR - DPZ
44%
Loosely correlated
-1.57%
FRSH - DPZ
39%
Loosely correlated
-1.59%
CNNE - DPZ
39%
Loosely correlated
-0.73%
MCD - DPZ
35%
Loosely correlated
-1.22%
More

NIHL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NIHL and DPZ have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NIHL and DPZ's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NIHL
1D Price
Change %
NIHL100%
N/A
DPZ - NIHL
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.36%
SGLOF - NIHL
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PZRIF - NIHL
0%
Poorly correlated
-0.60%
RSTRF - NIHL
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MARZF - NIHL
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More