DRIV
Price
$37.05
Change
-$0.96 (-2.53%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Net Assets
435.81M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
ICLN
Price
$19.50
Change
-$0.79 (-3.89%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Net Assets
2.94B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

DRIV vs ICLN

DRIV vs ICLN Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF (DRIV) vs. iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN)

Key Takeaways

  • DRIV tracks the Solactive Autonomous & Electric Vehicles Index with a focus on autonomous driving technology, electric vehicles, and related components, while ICLN tracks the S&P Global Clean Energy Transition Index for broader exposure to global clean energy companies.
  • DRIV maintains approximately 75 holdings with an expense ratio of 0.68%, compared to ICLN's roughly 106 holdings and lower expense ratio of 0.39%.
  • Both ETFs employ passive indexing strategies within thematic sectors, offering investors differentiated exposure to transportation electrification versus renewable power generation without direct competition.
  • DRIV exhibits higher concentration in technology and semiconductor names, whereas ICLN shows greater weighting toward solar, wind, and fuel cell companies with a more global footprint.
  • Structural differences in holdings count and costs influence relative positioning, with ICLN providing broader diversification and DRIV offering deeper focus on vehicle autonomy themes.
  • In recent market cycles, both have responded to shifts in interest rate expectations and policy support for clean technologies, though their distinct sub-sector tilts create varying sensitivity to commodity prices and regulatory developments.

Introduction

Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF (DRIV) and iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) represent two distinct thematic approaches within the broader clean technology investment landscape. DRIV targets companies advancing autonomous vehicles and electric mobility, while ICLN provides exposure to renewable energy generation and clean power infrastructure worldwide. These ETFs do not compete head-to-head but serve as alternative vehicles for investors seeking growth tied to decarbonization and technological innovation in transportation and energy. Their comparison highlights differences in sector breadth, geographic reach, cost efficiency, and risk concentration that can guide allocation decisions based on specific thematic preferences.

Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF (DRIV) Overview

The Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF (DRIV) seeks to replicate the performance of the Solactive Autonomous & Electric Vehicles Index. It is a passively managed thematic ETF with approximately 75 holdings as of recent data. The index methodology emphasizes companies involved in electric vehicle production, components, materials, and autonomous driving technologies, including network-connected services. Top holdings typically include technology leaders such as Intel Corporation (INTC), QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM), NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA), Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL), and Tesla, Inc. (TSLA), with the top 10 positions accounting for roughly 26% of assets. Sector allocation leans heavily toward technology, reflecting semiconductor and software exposure. The ETF carries an expense ratio of 0.68% and rebalances periodically to maintain index alignment. Its structure provides targeted access to the electrification and autonomy themes within global equity markets.

iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) Overview

The iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) aims to track the S&P Global Clean Energy Transition Index, offering passive exposure to approximately 106 global companies engaged in clean energy activities. Holdings concentrate on renewable power producers, equipment manufacturers, and related infrastructure, with notable positions often including Bloom Energy Corporation (BE), NextEra Energy-related entities, and First Solar, Inc. (FSLR). The top 10 holdings represent around 50-54% of the portfolio. Sector exposure spans utilities, industrials, and technology with a global distribution across developed and emerging markets. The fund maintains an expense ratio of 0.39%, lower than many thematic peers, and follows standard index rebalancing protocols. This structure delivers diversified access to the clean energy transition theme through a broad basket of equities.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The clean technology sector encompassing electric mobility and renewable energy continues to benefit from long-term policy support, technological advancements, and corporate sustainability commitments. Macroeconomic drivers include evolving interest rate environments that affect capital-intensive projects, supply chain developments in critical minerals, and geopolitical factors influencing energy security. Regulatory initiatives promoting emissions reductions and infrastructure investment serve as key catalysts, while risks stem from commodity price volatility, trade tensions, and varying adoption rates across regions. Both ETFs operate within this dynamic environment, where capital flows toward decarbonization themes remain sensitive to broader economic cycles and energy transition timelines.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, DRIV and ICLN have displayed differing responses to sector rotations driven by technology earnings, interest rate shifts, and clean energy policy announcements. DRIV's heavier technology weighting has aligned its movements more closely with semiconductor and software cycles, contributing to potentially elevated volatility during periods of rapid innovation or supply constraints. ICLN's broader clean energy mandate and global holdings have provided exposure to utility-like stability alongside growth in solar and wind segments, resulting in distinct sensitivity to commodity trends and international regulatory changes. Relative positioning reflects these profiles: DRIV offers concentrated thematic depth in vehicle autonomy, while ICLN emphasizes diversified renewable generation exposure with lower costs supporting long-term holding considerations.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. AI Screener

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors including lower expense ratio, higher number of holdings for diversification, and broad exposure to global clean energy momentum, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modestly higher probability of favorability to iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) for investors seeking cost-efficient thematic positioning with balanced risk characteristics.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations
VS
DRIV vs. ICLN commentary
Jun 27, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DRIV is a Hold and ICLN is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ICLN has more net assets: 2.94B vs. DRIV (436M). DRIV has a higher annual dividend yield than ICLN: DRIV (25.242) vs ICLN (19.004). DRIV was incepted earlier than ICLN: DRIV (8 years) vs ICLN (18 years). ICLN (0.39) has a lower expense ratio than DRIV (0.68). DRIV has a higher turnover ICLN (25.00) vs ICLN (25.00).
DRIVICLNDRIV / ICLN
Gain YTD25.24219.004133%
Net Assets436M2.94B15%
Total Expense Ratio0.680.39174%
Turnover37.4625.00150%
Yield0.761.1467%
Fund Existence8 years18 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DRIVICLN
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
88%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DRIV
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
ICLN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MOINX36.230.18
+0.50%
NYLI WMC Small Companies Investor Class
SEKCX26.92N/A
N/A
DWS Emerging Markets Equity C
AUENX18.45N/A
N/A
AQR Large Cap Defensive Style N
BMSYX17.56N/A
N/A
MFS Blended Research Mid Cap Eq R6
CGVFX30.85-0.15
-0.48%
American Funds Global Insight 529-F-1

DRIV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DRIV has been closely correlated with STM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DRIV jumps, then STM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DRIV
1D Price
Change %
DRIV100%
-2.53%
STM - DRIV
85%
Closely correlated
-4.62%
CEVA - DRIV
71%
Closely correlated
-3.77%
ALGM - DRIV
70%
Closely correlated
-3.77%
DAN - DRIV
69%
Closely correlated
-1.12%
ENS - DRIV
64%
Loosely correlated
-1.96%
More

ICLN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ICLN has been closely correlated with NXT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ICLN jumps, then NXT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ICLN
1D Price
Change %
ICLN100%
-3.89%
NXT - ICLN
73%
Closely correlated
-5.50%
BE - ICLN
69%
Closely correlated
-18.49%
FCEL - ICLN
68%
Closely correlated
+22.14%
FSLR - ICLN
64%
Loosely correlated
-3.85%
SEDG - ICLN
58%
Loosely correlated
-0.25%
More