DRS
Price
$48.10
Change
-$0.06 (-0.12%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
12.86B
5 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
GD
Price
$386.62
Change
+$4.83 (+1.27%)
Updated
Jul 24, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
103.25B
5 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

DRS vs GD

DRS vs GD Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
Jul 19, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Leonardo DRS (DRS) vs. General Dynamics (GD) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Leonardo DRS delivered 13% organic revenue growth in fiscal 2025 with a $8.7 billion backlog, yet its stock has experienced notable volatility, including a sharp double-digit sell-off in recent weeks before recovering.
  • General Dynamics posted a 10.1% revenue increase in 2025 to $52.55 billion and carries a record total backlog of approximately $118 billion, providing substantial multi-year revenue visibility.
  • Both companies benefit from elevated global defense spending, but DRS operates as a more focused, mid-cap pure-play on advanced sensing and naval propulsion, while GD spans across aerospace, marine systems, combat vehicles, and IT services.
  • GD's valuation sits at roughly 16 times forward earnings with mid-single-digit growth projected for 2026, whereas DRS trades at a premium multiple that reflects faster recent top-line momentum but also higher price sensitivity to growth expectations.
  • DRS's 40% increase in R&D (Research and Development) spending signals an aggressive push into next-generation defense technologies, while GD's mature, diversified model emphasizes operational execution and cash flow conversion.

Introduction

Investors tracking the defense sector are increasingly examining how differently sized and positioned contractors perform against the same geopolitical backdrop. DRS and GD represent two distinct approaches to defense investing: a focused, rapidly expanding mid-cap innovator versus a diversified, blue-chip aerospace and defense titan. With sustained global demand for advanced military capabilities — from submarine propulsion to tactical sensing and business jets — understanding how these two companies compare on growth trajectory, risk profile, and market positioning can help traders and long-term investors assess which name aligns with their strategy. This stock comparison examines recent performance, underlying catalysts, and what observable trends may signal about the relative attractiveness of each.

DRS Overview and Recent Performance

DRS, Leonardo DRS, Inc., is a mid-cap defense technology company specializing in advanced sensing, computing, electric power and propulsion systems, and integrated mission solutions. The company serves as a critical supplier to the U.S. Navy's Columbia-class submarine program and provides tactical radars, naval network computing, and advanced infrared sensing for multiple defense platforms. For full-year 2025, DRS reported $3.6 billion in revenue, representing 13% organic growth, while net earnings climbed 31% to $278 million. Adjusted diluted EPS (Earnings Per Share) reached $1.15, a 24% increase year-over-year.

In recent weeks, DRS stock has exhibited heightened volatility. After reaching an all-time high near $49.69 in early June 2026, shares pulled back sharply, reflecting broader market gyrations and possible profit-taking following a strong year-to-date run of approximately 30%. A pronounced multi-day sell-off in late April 2026 erased roughly 16% of the company's market capitalization before a partial recovery. The company's $8.7 billion backlog, representing a 1.2x book-to-bill ratio for 2025, underscores sustained customer demand. Management has initiated 2026 guidance calling for revenue between $3.85 billion and $3.95 billion and Adjusted Diluted EPS of $1.20 to $1.26, implying continued mid-to-high single-digit organic expansion.

GD Overview and Recent Performance

GD, General Dynamics Corporation, is one of the world's largest aerospace and defense contractors, operating across four segments: Aerospace (Gulfstream business jets), Marine Systems (submarine and surface ship construction), Combat Systems (land combat vehicles and munitions), and Technologies (IT services and C5ISR solutions — encompassing command, control, communications, computers, cyber, intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance). For full-year 2025, GD generated $52.55 billion in revenue, up 10.1%, while diluted EPS rose 13.4% to $15.45. The company's total backlog surged approximately 30% to $118 billion, with total estimated contract value reaching nearly $179 billion.

The stock demonstrated relatively strong momentum over the past year, gaining approximately 25%, significantly outpacing the broader defense industry average. In recent weeks, however, GD shares have encountered headwinds, declining modestly after its fourth-quarter 2025 earnings report despite beating consensus estimates on both revenue and EPS. Investors appear to be digesting the company's 2026 guidance, which projects mid-single-digit growth — approximately 4% to 5% in both revenue and earnings — on a valuation multiple near 16 times forward earnings. Margin dynamics remain mixed: Marine Systems delivered standout revenue growth of 22% in the fourth quarter with margin improvement, while the Aerospace and Technologies segments faced margin compression. Free cash flow conversion reached 94% of net earnings in 2025, reinforcing GD's reputation for disciplined capital deployment.

Trending AI Robots

For traders seeking a data-driven edge in navigating comparisons like this one, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated selection of AI-powered trading bots actively scanning the market. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI-driven trading bots covering thousands of tickers, each with distinct trading styles, timeframes, risk parameters, and performance track records. Only those bots demonstrating the strongest alignment with current market conditions earn placement in this rotating, curated section. Depending on the bot, traders can observe statistics such as annualized return rates, win ratios, trade frequency, and Sharpe ratios — all updated in real time. Whether you favor swing trading, trend-following, or mean-reversion strategies, these autonomous systems analyze vast datasets beyond human capacity. Explore the Trending AI Robots to see which strategies are currently resonating with the market.

Head-to-Head Comparison

The most immediate contrast between DRS and GD is scale. DRS operates with roughly $3.6 billion in annual revenue and a market capitalization near $11.8 billion, making it a focused mid-cap with concentrated exposure to naval propulsion, advanced sensing, and tactical radar programs. GD, with $52.55 billion in revenue and a market cap approaching $95 billion, is a sprawling defense prime with exposure spanning nuclear submarines, armored combat vehicles, IT services, and luxury business jets. This divergence creates different risk-reward profiles: DRS offers higher organic growth rates — 13% in 2025 versus GD's 10% — but carries greater concentration risk and stock price volatility. GD's diversification provides ballast but also caps its growth ceiling.

On growth drivers, both companies benefit from the Columbia-class submarine program, though in different capacities: DRS supplies electric propulsion components, while GD's Marine Systems segment constructs the vessels. DRS's recent strategic moves, including a 10-year, $100 million laser intellectual property licensing agreement for quantum computing applications, suggest an appetite for technology-driven revenue diversification. GD's growth narrative leans more heavily on aerospace — Gulfstream deliveries have accelerated with the G700 and G800 models — and on international combat vehicle contracts, including recent multi-billion-dollar awards from Germany for EAGLE tactical vehicles. Risk factors also diverge: DRS faces supply-chain exposure to germanium and other specialized materials, while GD contends with tariff impacts on aerospace components and labor constraints at its shipyards. From a sentiment standpoint, GD's record $118 billion backlog and consistent dividend track record appeal to institutional investors seeking stability, whereas DRS's higher growth rate and smaller base attract investors willing to tolerate greater price swings for potentially higher percentage returns.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable trend consistency, relative momentum, and risk-adjusted positioning, Tickeron's AI analytical framework would likely lean toward GD for stability-oriented positioning in the current environment. GD's record backlog, diversified revenue streams across four segments, strong free cash flow generation (94% conversion rate), and consistently positive order activity — including a 1.5-to-1 book-to-bill ratio in the most recent reported quarter — suggest steadier trend persistence. That said, DRS may attract the AI's attention during momentum-driven market regimes, given its superior top-line growth trajectory, expanding R&D investment (up 40% in 2025), and potential for sharper upside moves when defense spending tailwinds intensify. The probabilistic assessment is that GD offers a higher-confidence trend profile with lower expected volatility, while DRS presents a higher-beta opportunity that may suit momentum-oriented strategies during periods of elevated defense sector enthusiasm.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
DRS vs. GD commentary
Jul 25, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DRS is a Buy and GD is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 25, 2026
Stock price -- (DRS: $48.16 vs. GD: $381.79)
Brand notoriety: DRS and GD are both not notable
Both companies represent the Aerospace & Defense industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DRS: 58% vs. GD: 142%
Market capitalization -- DRS: $12.86B vs. GD: $103.25B
DRS [@Aerospace & Defense] is valued at $12.86B. GD’s [@Aerospace & Defense] market capitalization is $103.25B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Aerospace & Defense] industry ranges from $1.56T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Aerospace & Defense] industry is $38.32B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DRS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGD’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • DRS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GD’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, GD is a better buy in the long-term than DRS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DRS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GD’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DRS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • GD’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GD is a better buy in the short-term than DRS.

Price Growth

DRS (@Aerospace & Defense) experienced а +11.74% price change this week, while GD (@Aerospace & Defense) price change was +3.52% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Aerospace & Defense industry was -0.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.55%.

Reported Earning Dates

DRS is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.

GD is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Aerospace & Defense (-0.18% weekly)

Aerospace & Defense is one of largest industries in the U.S., mainly comprising the following areas: commercial airliners, military aircraft, missiles, space, and general aviation. Focused heavily on research & development, it is also one of the fastest growing industries. Military aircraft has the largest market share in the industry’s sales, followed by space systems, civil aircraft, and missiles. Aerospace exports, directly and indirectly, support more jobs than the export of any other commodity, according to a study by the U.S. Department of Commerce. Boeing Company, Lockheed Martin Corporation and General Electric Company are some of the most prominent players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GD($103B) has a higher market cap than DRS($12.9B). DRS has higher P/E ratio than GD: DRS (45.04) vs GD (24.03). DRS YTD gains are higher at: 41.840 vs. GD (14.901). GD has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 6.59B vs. DRS (456M). DRS has less debt than GD: DRS (271M) vs GD (9.83B). GD has higher revenues than DRS: GD (53.8B) vs DRS (3.7B).
DRSGDDRS / GD
Capitalization12.9B103B13%
EBITDA456M6.59B7%
Gain YTD41.84014.901281%
P/E Ratio45.0424.03187%
Revenue3.7B53.8B7%
Total Cash328MN/A-
Total Debt271M9.83B3%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GD: Fundamental Ratings
GD
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
34
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
51
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9
SMR RATING
1..100
49
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
20
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
34
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DRSGD
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
36%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DRS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
GD
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ODYS4.660.05
+1.08%
Odysight.ai Inc
NTNX52.63-0.73
-1.37%
Nutanix
PHGE0.20N/A
-2.22%
BiomX Inc.
ITIC276.21-7.09
-2.50%
Investors Title Company
ANDE78.25-2.62
-3.24%
Andersons

GD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GD has been loosely correlated with LHX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GD jumps, then LHX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GD
1D Price
Change %
GD100%
+2.31%
LHX - GD
61%
Loosely correlated
+5.09%
HII - GD
54%
Loosely correlated
+3.54%
RTX - GD
53%
Loosely correlated
+7.33%
LMT - GD
48%
Loosely correlated
+10.54%
DRS - GD
48%
Loosely correlated
+4.90%
More