DRS vs LSIIF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DRS is a Hold and LSIIF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
DRS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLSIIF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- DRS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- LSIIF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
DRS’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- DRS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
DRS (@Aerospace & Defense) experienced а +7.36% price change this week, while LSIIF (@Aerospace & Defense) price change was +12.28% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Aerospace & Defense industry was +3.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.74%.
Reported Earning Dates
DRS is expected to report earnings on Apr 30, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Aerospace & Defense (+3.34% weekly)Aerospace & Defense is one of largest industries in the U.S., mainly comprising the following areas: commercial airliners, military aircraft, missiles, space, and general aviation. Focused heavily on research & development, it is also one of the fastest growing industries. Military aircraft has the largest market share in the industry’s sales, followed by space systems, civil aircraft, and missiles. Aerospace exports, directly and indirectly, support more jobs than the export of any other commodity, according to a study by the U.S. Department of Commerce. Boeing Company, Lockheed Martin Corporation and General Electric Company are some of the most prominent players in this space.
| DRS | LSIIF | DRS / LSIIF | |
| Capitalization | 9.67B | 1.42B | 681% |
| EBITDA | 376M | 241M | 156% |
| Gain YTD | 13.171 | 31.561 | 42% |
| P/E Ratio | 45.58 | 22.53 | 202% |
| Revenue | 3.23B | 1.79B | 180% |
| Total Cash | 598M | 192M | 311% |
| Total Debt | 458M | 680M | 67% |
| DRS | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 56% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 50% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 51% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| HFXI | 26.70 | 0.34 | +1.29% |
| NYLI FTSE International Eq Ccy Netrl ETF | |||
| SOCL | 40.60 | 0.31 | +0.76% |
| Global X Social Media ETF | |||
| XLY | 185.40 | 1.16 | +0.63% |
| The Consumer Discret Sel SectSPDR® ETF | |||
| CBON | 22.05 | 0.05 | +0.25% |
| VanEck China Bond ETF | |||
| DNOV | 40.74 | 0.06 | +0.15% |
| FT Vest US Equity Deep Bffr ETF Nov | |||
DRS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DRS has been loosely correlated with CW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DRS jumps, then CW could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DRS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DRS | 100% | +1.53% | ||
| CW - DRS | 59% Loosely correlated | -0.47% | ||
| KTOS - DRS | 52% Loosely correlated | -0.54% | ||
| AIR - DRS | 51% Loosely correlated | +0.09% | ||
| BWXT - DRS | 46% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| HWM - DRS | 45% Loosely correlated | -0.56% | ||
More | ||||
LSIIF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that LSIIF and SGGKF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LSIIF and SGGKF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LSIIF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LSIIF | 100% | N/A | ||
| SGGKF - LSIIF | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ACLLY - LSIIF | 6% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| HAGHY - LSIIF | 6% Poorly correlated | +0.39% | ||
| DRS - LSIIF | 5% Poorly correlated | +1.53% | ||
| MAXQF - LSIIF | 2% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||