Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DWGFX vs RNWHX
DWGFX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts DWGFX vs RNWHX
DWGFX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DWGFX vs. RNWHX commentary
Jul 26, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DWGFX is a Hold and RNWHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90.7B vs. DWGFX (2.7B). DWGFX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: DWGFX (1.36) vs RNWHX (1.14). DWGFX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: DWGFX (12 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). DWGFX (1.17) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). DWGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.00 vs. RNWHX (46.00). DWGFX (250) and RNWHX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. DWGFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.93 vs. RNWHX (15.58). DWGFX return over 5 years is better than : 25.14 vs. RNWHX (12.84).
| DWGFX | RNWHX | DWGFX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 0.72 | 163% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 0.72 | 163% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.636 | 10.921 | 116% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.7B | 90.7B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.36 | 1.14 | 119% |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.93 | 15.58 | 160% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.22 | 40.80 | 138% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.14 | 12.84 | 196% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.14 | 103.12 | 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement