Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EACOX vs RNWHX
EACOX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts EACOX vs RNWHX
EACOX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EACOX vs. RNWHX commentary
Aug 09, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EACOX is a StrongBuy and RNWHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90.7B vs. EACOX (4.06B). EACOX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: EACOX (2.05) vs RNWHX (1.17). EACOX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: EACOX (12 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). EACOX (1.48) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). EACOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.00 vs. RNWHX (46.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than EACOX: RNWHX (250) vs EACOX (1000). EACOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.01 vs. RNWHX (20.97). EACOX return over 5 years is better than : 87.47 vs. RNWHX (17.46).
| EACOX | RNWHX | EACOX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 0.72 | 194% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.72 | 206% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.441 | 15.251 | 134% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.06B | 90.7B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.05 | 1.17 | 175% |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.01 | 20.97 | 134% |
| Returns for 3 years | 84.15 | 48.57 | 173% |
| Returns for 5 years | 87.47 | 17.46 | 501% |
| Returns for 10 years | 191.27 | 106.97 | 179% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement